FDA’s new stem cell guidelines receive both praise and criticism

a a b z
A cluster of nascent retinae generated from 3D embryonic stem cell cultures (Credit: UCL News via Flickr)

The [FDA’s] new guidelines…clarify existing regulation by outlining what uses of human tissue can be offered to patients without FDA approval.

The major points in the new guidelines specify that: the function of these cells in the recipient’s body must be the same as in the donor; the treatment cells don’t affect the whole body of the recipient; and manufacturers can only manipulate the cells “minimally”; along with which chemicals manufacturers can use to treat cells and prevent disease transmission.

The FDA notes the revised guidelines are meant to help manufacturers navigate regulations…[b]ut many interpret them as a crackdown on clinics offering patients experimental procedures.

[S]everal doctors, researchers and nurses who spoke at the hearings said that patients are the ones who suffer in an unregulated system.

In the other camp, clinicians and industry representatives pushed back on the FDA’s restrictive wording in the guidelines…Some told the FDA to scrap its draft completely whereas others commended the agency on its more restrictive wording with only minor edits.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. Read full, original post: Stem Cell Advocates and Critics Push Back on FDA Guidelines

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

wuhan institute of virology main entrance
​​COVID lab leak? Making a case that the Wuhan market origins theory is wrong
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
Screenshot-2026-06-18-at-11.41.51-AM
Viewpoint—Protecting baloney science: Far right senators move to protect the phony homeopathy industry
artificial intelligence brain think illustration md
Viewpoint — Digital gods and human extinction: Will we be the first species ever to design our own descendants?

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.