White House releases coordinated summary for all US biotechnology regulation

Screen Shot at PM

Editor’s Note: The following is a portion of the coordinated summary released by the White House outlining the Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology.

The release on January 4th, 2017 of the 2017 Update to the Coordinated Framework for the Regulation of Biotechnology represents the first time in 30 years that the Federal government has produced a comprehensive summary of the roles and responsibilities of the three principal regulatory agencies with respect to regulating biotechnology products.

…

Early in 2016, EPA, FDA, and USDA commissioned an independent study by the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) on future biotechnology products. The study, which is ongoing, will identify (1) major advances and potential new types of biotechnology products over the next five to ten years, (2) potential future products that might pose a different type of risk relative to existing products and organisms, (3) areas in which the risks or lack of risk relating to biotechnology are well understood, and (4) the scientific capabilities, tools, and expertise that may be useful to the regulatory agencies as they oversee potential future products of biotechnology.

…The findings by the NAS report on future biotechnology products, along with the comments submitted in response to the proposed Update to the Coordinated Framework and information gathered during the three public engagement sessions that EPA, FDA, and USDA hosted in 2016, will be considered by these agencies in order to inform ongoing and future agency activities.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post: Increasing the Transparency, Coordination, and Predictability of the Biotechnology Regulatory System

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-10-06-at-2.36.47-PM
Is organic farming really more sustainable? 100 recent studies say ‘no’
Supreme-Court-Amid-Climate-Crisis
Should fossil fuel companies be shielded from lawsuits over climate change damage? The Supreme Court takes up the question
Screenshot 2025-09-17 at 12.41
Jump-starting global warming: Rising temperatures are driving up emissions from wildfires, fermenting wetlands, and melting permafrost
Screenshot-2026-10-02-at-9.11.36-AM
The genetics of personality
Radioactive-Americana-Collage-2
The kooky logic behind the raft of spurious cancer claims from Harvard’s T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Kind-People-Kind-Futures-Hands
Patches for sleep, weight, NAD+, energy, focus, periods. No evidence to support the latest social media wellness scams
Childrens-Health-Defense-Press-Briefing
Court links patient’s death to anti-vaccine doctor promoted by Kennedy’s Children’s Health Defense
Screenshot-2026-09-28-at-11.26.17-AM
Viewpoint: Wellness movement activists reposition nicotine from a killer addictive drug into a cure-all for brain ills
Screenshot-2026-09-22-at-10.54.12-AM
‘They misunderstand science’: Research attempting to tie autism to changes in the gut microbiome comes under fire
strand of dna genetics
No, GMO foods do not “damage genes, natural disposition and hormones, or decrease physical health and intelligence”
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-21-2026-11_21_39-AM
Viewpoint: Food cults: Online ‘nutrition communities’ can pose unique dangers
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.