Massachusetts mulls restrictions on neonicotinoid pesticides over bee safety concerns

Screen Shot at PM
Beekeeper Charlotte Trim, of Lincoln, Massachusetts. (Photo: Wicked Local, Ann Ringwood)

A type of pesticide many beekeepers blame for mass bee die-offs would come under tighter regulation under a bill filed in the Massachusetts legislature in January [2017].

Over the past decade, pesticides containing a classification of chemicals called neonicotinoids have come under mounting suspicion by beekeepers, who have reported high death rates among their honeybees.

[The] bill, which has 134 co-sponsors, would bar anyone who hasn’t completed a state training and certification program from applying neonicotinoid pesticides. It would also be illegal to apply the pesticides during blooming season. Stores and garden centers selling plants pre-treated with the pesticides would be required to clearly label them.

Maryland and Connecticut recently enacted similar restrictions on the pesticides, and the European Union put a moratorium on their use in 2013.

….

Brad Mitchell, director of government affairs for the Massachusetts Farm Bureau Federation and a former toxicology expert for the Massachusetts Toxicology Board, believes states like Massachusetts should wait for the federal Environmental Protection Agency to further study the matter and issue guidance before enacting neonicotinoid restrictions or bans.

Mitchell said many studies have been flawed. He doesn’t believe the science supports that neonicotinoids are the primary cause of large-scale bee die-offs. Parasitic mites, diseases, and poor bee husbandry, he argues, could be more significant factors.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Read full, original post: Lawmakers considering pesticide restrictions to limit bee die-offs

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Feb-16-2026-01_57_31-PM
Viewpoint: ‘Science-as-Satan’ unites the MAHA—MAGA movements. Is a breakup in the works?
bayer-supremecourt-lt
EPA concludes glyphosate is not carcinogenic. Missouri courts say Monsanto failed to warn it might be. SCOTUS weighs in.
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-22-2026-11_06_18-AM
Wellness influencer nonsense: No, nicotine does not boost cognition and productivity, but it can damage your health 
Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-3.54.04-PM
AI disinformation stress test: Challenges and response strategies
ChatGPT-Image-Feb-16-2026-01_04_32-PM
Raw milk myth wake-up call
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-11-2026-11_58_46-AM
The Trump administration has run out more than 4,000 National Institutes of Health employees. Here are the consequences
Screenshot-2026-04-21-at-1.11.22-PM
Boy Kibble: Muscle-building protein maxxing is the latest male health delusion
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-23-2026-09_20_20-PM
Kennedy’s CDC blocks publication of study that shows vaccines reduce hospitalizations by 50%, then misrepresents why
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-2-2026-03_22_54-PM
Why ‘support supplements’ for GLP-1 users are mostly a waste of money
Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-3.34.46-PM
Viewpoint: How do you sell evidence-based health and science in a world where facts don’t matter?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.