Facing accusations that its cancer designations are politicized, WHO’s IARC may lose US funding

iarc head office e x
Image Credit: Kennydu69, CC BY-SA 3.0, Wikimedia Commons

Members of the House Appropriations Committee are threatening to withhold funding for the International Agency for Cancer Research (IARC), whose methods have been under fire recently not only from Congress, but also in the courts.

IARC is a member of the World Health Organization, which receives some funding from U.S. taxpayers via the National Institutes of Health (NIH). A new bill put in play last week from House appropriators tells the NIH that it cannot transfer funding to IARC unless the center increases the transparency behind its cancer research and adds other reforms.

The move comes amid a flurry of activity related to IARC’s controversial research in 2015 culminating in a decision to label the chemical glyphosate as a probable carcinogen. That label carries enormous implications because glyphosate is the key ingredient in the herbicide RoundUp, which besides being a popular home and garden retail product is also used in large-scale farming.

…

The American Council on Science and Health, self-described as a “pro-science consumer advocacy organization,” issued a 2017 staff report saying that, “IARC has continued to apply its classification system largely as if the last half-century of scientific research hadn’t happened, completely ignoring issues of dose and exposure that are fundamental to risk assessment as it has been practiced around the world for several decades.”

Read full, original article: Congress Threatens Funding for Controversial Cancer Research Group

 

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Stern-Profile-and-Marked-U.S.-Map
RFK Jr.’s collapsing legacy: U.S. poised to lose measles elimination status
Colorful GLP-1 Pens with Clocks_tagger
Biohacker influencers are claiming GLP-1 weight loss drugs extend lifespan. One mice experiment suggests there may be some truth to the claim
Screenshot-2026-11-04-at-11.31.42-AM
Uneasy allies: Are MAHA and American agriculture careening toward a breakup?
Aerial Sprayer Over Gradient Fields
Farming, food, and chemicals: Post-midterms, the MAHA alliance between Democrats and MAGA Republicans is bruised but not cowed. What comes next?
Children’s Health Defense Press Conference
As measles deaths among the unvaccinated hit a 35-year high, Kennedy-founded Children’s Health Defense bizarrely blames doctors for slow-walking a cure
Supplement Rain Wellness Illustration
Viewpoint: Bedeviled by “toxic inflammation”? How wellness grifters turn this scientific gray zone into a supplement jackpot
Teal Hexagon Technology Icons
4 key ways the Blue Wave will upend science policy
Screenshot-2026-11-06-at-11.44.47-AM
'Gattaca stack': The eugenic, technological push to 'improve the human stock'
Bayer Crop Circle in Golden Wheat
Making fertilizer from thin air: Bayer’s gene-editing innovation could dramatically cut chemical fertilizer use in growing food
Wave Crest Over Red Cross
Viewpoint: Here are the election-inspired Trump administration healthcare policy reversals expected in the coming months
Neon Binary Code Bacteriophage
AI medicine breakthrough: Could ‘good viruses’ created by AI, cure deadly viruses?
Confident Doctor in Clinical Setting
More than 80% of ‘pro-science’ candidates were swept into office. Will they have a policy impact?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.