Viewpoint: FDA should eliminate non-GMO labels that ‘vilify’ food innovation

non gmo whole foods sign

It’s high time for the FDA to protect food innovation. The greatest tool for breakthroughs in food — genetic engineering — is being vilified in ways that break the law in order to get rid of the technology.

I grew up helping my father, a papaya farmer, grow our crops …. the papaya industry was hit hard by a disease in the 1950s called papaya ring spot virus …. Fortunately, in 1998 the virus-resistant Rainbow papaya was approved and commercialized, and the papaya industry was saved.

It’s impossible to go to the grocery store today without seeing products saying “all natural,” and “GMO-free.” …. The worst offender is the “Non-GMO Project Verified” label …. It shocked me to read that the Non-GMO Project wants “to shrink the market for existing GMO ingredients and prevent new commercial biotech crops.”

FDA …. fails to understand that allowing products to advertise that they do not have GMOs is [no] different than a competitor badmouthing someone else making the same product — and it’s against the law.

This is exactly the type of misleading advertising that the Federal Trade Commission says is illegal. If it were up to the anti-GMO folks, Hawaii would have lost its papaya industry to the ring spot virus.

Read full, original article: Island Voices: FDA must help food innovation in isles (Behind Paywall)

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}
screenshot at  pm

Are pesticide residues on food something to worry about?

In 1962, Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring drew attention to pesticides and their possible dangers to humans, birds, mammals and the ...
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.