Brazilian case study highlights dramatic sustainability and economic benefits of GMO Bt insect-resistant cotton, corn and soybeans

bn ks soybea p

Without access to insect resistance technology, inserted into Bt cotton, corn and soybean seeds, Brazilian farmers could lose [approximately $23 billion] over the next decade….

The data come from the study “Economic and socioenvironmental impacts of insect resistant plant technology in Brazil: historical analysis, perspectives and future challenges,”ย released January 28.ย According to the survey, from 2005 to 2018, insect-resistant cotton, maize and soybean seeds generated an additional [$5.9 billion, approximately] in profit for farmers.

[Editor’s note: The study was written in Portuguese.]

The study, conducted by the Biotechnology Information Council (CIB) in partnership with Agroconsult, evaluated insect-resistant cotton, maize and soybean crops and compared them with crops that do not have the protection offered by transgenic [GMO] varieties.

[T]he environment also benefited….From 2005 to 2018, the cultivation of Bt plants cut the volume of insecticides applied in the field by 122 thousand tons, or 50 thousand tons of active ingredient.

Less machinery was used as well and 144 million liters of fuel were not used, the equivalent of withdrawing 96 million cars from the streets for a year.ย For the next decade, this sustainable contribution could be even greater, as more than 294 million tons of insecticides are expected to be saved.

[Editor’s note: This article was published in Portuguese. This summary was prepared with Google Translate.]

Read full, original article: Without Bt seeds, Brazilian producers may lose R $86 billion in 10 years

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesnโ€™t change the scienceโ€”the worldโ€™s most popular herbicide is safeย 
Picture1
The FDA couldnโ€™t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
global warming
โ€˜Implausibleโ€™: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenarioโ€”soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-12.15.17-PM
UK gene-editing milestone: Livestock barley that increases ruminant value and reduces methane emissions is first-approved CRISPR crop
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
vax-misinformation-main
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Limit free speech to blunt social media misinfo?
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-3.15.53-PM
Chiropractors may no longer be modern-day snake oil salesmen, but the benefits of their therapy are limitedโ€“at best
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research showsโ€”but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
Screenshot-2026-05-20-at-5.11.17-PM
Viewpoint: No, sugar doesnโ€™t โ€˜feedโ€™ cancer โ€” common cancer myths, debunked

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.