Do these fossilized ‘tracks’ mean life gained mobility 600 million years earlier than we thought?

2-28-2019 a d ed a f c f a a source
Experts disagree over whether or not these tube-like formations in 2.1-billion-year-old rocks are signs of creeping, crawling organisms. If confirmed, the claim would place the emergence of motile life at least 1.5 billion years earlier than previously known. Image credit: A. El Albani/A. Mazurier/Université de Poitiers

On February 11, Abderrazak El Albani, a sedimentologist at the University of Poitiers in France, published a study in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences containing a spectacular claim: Life on Earth began making relatively large-scale active movements some 2.1 billion years ago.

That time is well within the era in which Earth’s biosphere was almost exclusively composed of single-celled organisms thought to be capable of only the most minuscule motion, and predates the generally accepted advent of large-scale biological motility by roughly 1.5 billion years. The evidence for this controversial conclusion is a collection of tiny burrowlike fissures in rocks found in the west African nation of Gabon.

Determining whether microscopic details in ancient rock formations are evidence of early life or the result of abiotic—or nonliving—processes is extremely difficult.

A discovery of this magnitude can often represent a major breakthrough, but occasionally it may be an overreach. “The good thing about science is that it’s inherently critical,” says Tanja Bosak, a geobiologist at Massachusetts Institute of Technology who was not involved in El Albani’s study. “Claims have to be constantly reevaluated and tested by more data and new experiments.”

Read full, original post: Did Crawling Critters Leave These Cracks? The Answer Could Rewrite Evolutionary History

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
global warming
‘Implausible’: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenario—soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-12.15.17-PM
UK gene-editing milestone: Livestock barley that increases ruminant value and reduces methane emissions is first-approved CRISPR crop
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
vax-misinformation-main
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Limit free speech to blunt social media misinfo?
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-3.15.53-PM
Chiropractors may no longer be modern-day snake oil salesmen, but the benefits of their therapy are limited–at best
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research shows—but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
Screenshot-2026-05-20-at-5.11.17-PM
Viewpoint: No, sugar doesn’t ‘feed’ cancer — common cancer myths, debunked

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.