The GLP is committed to full transparency. Download and review our just-released 2019 Annual Report.

Viewpoint: Legal crusade against Bayer’s Roundup herbicide threatens fish and wildlife

| | October 15, 2019

You’ve seen the ads flooding television and social media: “Have you been exposed to weed killer Roundup? If you have cancer, you may be eligible for compensation. Call our law offices … ”

In 2018 and 2019, California juries ordered Roundup’s producer, Monsanto, to pay multimillion-dollar compensations to four non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients who claimed to have been sickened by Roundup (one of dozens of formulations with herbicide glyphosate as the active ingredient) …. The California verdicts will almost certainly be overturned on appeal because they were based on the alleged failings of Monsanto, not on any scientific evidence …. Follow-up suits that aren’t settled are likely to fail, too.

Related article:  Mark Lynas: Monsanto’s Syngenta takeover proposal a ‘big mistake'

All scientific bodies that have seriously studied glyphosate report no link to cancer …. Yet, some environmental groups are calling for a total ban on glyphosate ….

Here’s why protecting the proper, responsible uses of glyphosate matters so much …. Glyphosate is the most effective tool, often the only tool, wildland and aquatic managers have for restoring fish and wildlife habitats destroyed by alien plants.

One boots-on-the ground NGO that gets it about glyphosate is the Nature Conservancy …. It applies glyphosate more than any of the other 18 herbicides it uses to save and recover fish and wildlife.

Read full, original article: Roundup Hysteria

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Click the link above to read the full, original article.
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.

Send this to a friend