EU GMO approval process hinders biotech crop development with no scientific justification, researchers argue

The approach to equivalence testing required by the [European Food Safety Authority, EFSA] creates unwarranted barriers to the introduction of GE crops. Given the abundant evidence that there is less variation in composition created through the process of developing GE crops than through conventional breeding and that, therefore, compositional changes that pose a health risk are highly improbable, there is little scientific rationale for the generation of data that actually hinder the development of new GE crops that address urgent societal challenges.

[Editor’s note: The authors are researchers at the biotech firm Corteva.]

The current experimental design required by the EFSA to satisfy their approach to statistical analysis results in the conduct of the single most expensive study (>US$1 million) in support of GE-crop regulatory approvals for products that have the potential to improve agricultural production and food safety. These obstacles can be surmounted by multinational corporations that develop seed for large-scale commodity crops, but these impediments create impenetrable barriers for non-commodity products and smaller companies and universities.

We therefore agree with van der Voet and Paoletti that it is perhaps time to refine or even reconsider the current EFSA compositional equivalency approach. If compositional equivalence studies remain a requirement for political purposes, it would be beneficial to develop a new approach that maintains the benefits of statistical equivalence testing (strict control of falsely declaring equivalence) while maximizing correct identification of true equivalence through use of extensive crop composition data to establish meaningful equivalence limits.

Related article:  Viewpoint: GMOs may be controversial, but bio-technology is creating a greener, cleaner world

Current regulation in the European Union seems to be driven largely by consumer fear of GE crops, resulting in the cultivation approval of only a single GE event that is grown on extremely limited acres. Compositional study designs that are biased toward falsely implicating lack of equivalence of GE to non-GE crops only reinforces those fears.

The health benefits (e.g., reduced mycotoxins in Bt maize grain) and environmental benefits (e.g., reduced insecticide use and greater adoption of reduced tillage) have largely been foregone within the European Union, calling into question the effectiveness of the current regulatory approach in “maximizing consumer protection”.

In our opinion, change must include policy revisions that clearly set the direction for regulators and support the public good, along with implementation of factual public education programs communicating the risks and benefits of GE crops.

Read the original post

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
can you boost your immune system to prevent coronavirus spread x

Video: How to boost your immune system to guard against COVID and other illnesses

Scientists have recently developed ways to measure your immune age. Fortunately, it turns out your immune age can go down ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
gmo corn field x

Do GMO Bt (insect-resistant) crops pose a threat to human health or the environment?

Bt is a bacterium found organically in the soil. It is extremely effective in repelling or killing target insects but ...

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend