Viewpoint: Sri Lankan families still paying price for government’s misguided green organic obsession

Sri Lankans line up for slim pickings at a grocery store. Credit: AFP via Getty Images
Sri Lankans line up for slim pickings at a grocery store. Credit: AFP via Getty Images

“Sri Lanka is a classic twin deficits economy,” an Asian Development Bank working paper said in 2019. “Twin deficits signal that a country’s national expenditure exceeds its national income, and that its production of tradable goods and services is inadequate.”

The situation was worsened by the Covid pandemic. President Gotabaya Rajapaksa and his brother, Prime Minister Mahinda Rajapaksa, also did a lot of damage to their nation because of their economic mismanagement. The country could still have weathered the storms, but then the Rajapaksas [forced] the nation to go organic by outlawing chemical fertilizers in April 2021.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

The opposite of whatever green fanatics say is always true; the Sri Lankan experiment was no exception. The fall in farm yields was steep. The ban was withdrawn in the wake of extensive protests, but the damage was done, with the paddy yields declining by around one-third all over the country.

It is not that organic farming is bad or fertilizers and pesticides are good. But organic farming can’t become beneficial for the greater good by executive fiats; it has to grow naturally, indeed organically; it has to adjust to the economic ecosystem. But it was thrust upon the market as a result of a politician’s fancy.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_32_36-PM
Viewpoint: The state of U.S. vaccine policy? Dismal nationally, but some states are stepping up.
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-10.46.29-AM
Viewpoint: How to counter science disinformation? Science journalist offers 12 practical tips
Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-1.39.26-PM
Viewpoint: ‘Safer for children?’ Stonyfield yogurt under fire for deceptive organic marketing
the magic of mRNA
Viewpoint: Anti-vax fake ‘turbo cancer’ claims threaten cancer treatment breakthroughs
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_16_37-PM-2
Viewpoint: Are cancer rates ‘skyrocketing’ as RFK, Jr. and MAHA claim? The evidence says mostly the opposite
Picture1-1
Cooling the planet with balloons: Could a geoengineering gamble slow global warming?
artificial intelligence brain think illustration md
Viewpoint — Digital gods and human extinction: Will we be the first species ever to design our own descendants?
Defense_Secretary_Ash_Carter_tours_the_Microsoft_Cybercrime_Center_in_Seattle_March_3_2016
How criminals are using AI to target social media users and steal their money and confidential data
Picture1-14
When superbugs threaten vulnerable children: Can AI help solve antibiotic resistance?
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-01_23_27-PM-2
Viewpoint: Will AI democratize personalized cancer treatment or fuel medical misinformation?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.