GMO cowpeas cut chemical spraying by 3/4 in Nigerian trials, but ‘environmentalist’ opponents lobby for ban

Nigeria could sorely use more food and less agricultural input usage. Credit: Nkechi Isaac
Nigeria could sorely use more food and less agricultural input usage. Credit: Nkechi Isaac

Research conducted by the Cornell University Alliance for Science, an independent nonprofit research institute, observed that Nigeria imports an estimated 500,000 tonnes of cowpea annually to meet its 3.6 million tonnes annual local demand.

This was attributed to the low yields generated by local cowpea farmers as a result of infestations by the legume borer (Maruca Vitrata), a harmful pest that devours cowpea leaves and seeds.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.
[A] new cowpea variety (Bt cowpea) was produced through the application of biotechnology, a process that involves harnessing genetic engineering in which a trans-gene from a naturally occuring bacteria in the soil (Bacillus thuringiensis) was cloned to create a pest-resistant cowpea… Following a series of experiments and satisfactory results, the Nigerian government approved the commercial production and cultivation of Bt cowpea across the country, becoming the first country in the world to adopt biotechnology in cowpea production.

Mariann Bassey-Orovwuje, [of] Friends of the Earth, Nigeria/Africa, said the introduction of GM engineered cowpea is a great cause for concern for farmers, consumers and civil society organisations across the continent.

Bassey-Orovwuje explained that while the technology is said to be provided royalty-free, the long-term implications of transforming the environment, farmers’ varieties, and production practices, will trap farmers into unsustainable, unsuitable, unaffordable farming practices.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research shows—but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-01_23_27-PM-2
Viewpoint: Will AI democratize personalized cancer treatment or fuel medical misinformation?

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.