DNA embryo screening: Huge gap between science behind polygenic scoring and parental desires to pick the ‘perfect kid’

Credit: Dr. B. Lal Institute of Biotechnology
Credit: Dr. B. Lal Institute of Biotechnology

One challenge with leading killers like cancer and heart disease is that they’re usually polygenic: linked to many different genes with complex interactions. Patients can now take tests that assess thousands of DNA data points to decode these complexities and compute the disease risks.

Genomic Prediction generates polygenic risk scores, predicting in percentage terms each embryo’s chances of contracting each disease in the panel, plus a composite score for overall health. Parents with multiple embryos can then weigh the scores when deciding which one to implant.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Massive global DNA repositories allow researchers to draw connections between certain genes and all manner of life outcomes. Some studies correlate genes with height; others, with how far a person is likely to go in school.

Genomic Prediction doesn’t offer scores on attributes unrelated to health, nor does rival Orchid, which is backed by 23andMe Inc. CEO Anne Wojcicki. But there are ways for motivated parents to get those kinds of predictions.

There’s some real daylight between the solid science behind polygenic scoring for disease risks and parental desires to pick the “perfect kid.”

So as the science makes its way into leading peer-reviewed journals, it’s yielding much more spirited debates than you usually see in publications with names like Fertility and Sterility. In general, the true believers say polygenic risk scoring should be available and clearly offered to everyone. Critics say it’s a slippery slope to designer babies.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_32_36-PM
Viewpoint: The state of U.S. vaccine policy? Dismal nationally, but some states are stepping up.
Screenshot-2026-05-19-at-11.23.34-AM
West-originated vaccine disinformation sparks murders of health care workers across Africa
_20250221_nib_rfk_trump
Viewpoint: 'Crisis of public trust': Autism support community shocked RFK continues to peddle false claims about the danger of vaccines
placebo
Viewpoint — Alternative medicine and the placebo effect: Selling a reassuring illusion of health
ChatGPT-Image-May-18-2026-01_45_05-PM-2
Newest hantavirus conspiracy: Online disinformation turns outbreak into latest ivermectin grift
Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-1.39.26-PM
Viewpoint: ‘Safer for children?’ Stonyfield yogurt under fire for deceptive organic marketing
ChatGPT-Image-May-18-2026-12_06_18-PM-2
Defying death: The immortality movement goes mainstream
Defense_Secretary_Ash_Carter_tours_the_Microsoft_Cybercrime_Center_in_Seattle_March_3_2016
How criminals are using AI to target social media users and steal their money and confidential data
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.