Could methane-burping cows one day become an unexpected part of the climate solution?

Credit: Liana Jegers
Credit: Liana Jegers

The concept of carbon neutral cows may seemingly conflict with the notion we must eat less meat and dairy to counter climate change. In the largest analysis of global food systems to date, published in Science in 2018, Joseph Poore and Thomas Nemecek found beef to be the most carbon-intensive food source, emitting around 85kg of CO2e for every 1kg of beef compared with 8.4kg of CO2e for poultry and 0.91kg for soy milk.

Since the 1960s, Allan Savory, a Zimbabwean farmer and scientist – and godfather of the regenerative livestock movement – has argued for greater use of animals as a means to battle environmental breakdown and cut carbon emissions.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

At the heart of Savory’s approach is mimicking the natural grazing patterns of livestock so often abandoned in modern agriculture. This typically involves mob grazing, a practice in which livestock is rotated in short bursts through small patches of high grass. This ensures most plants in that patch are either eaten or trampled before getting a long rest period.

Contrary to modern grazing systems that are shown to degrade biodiversity and soil health, mob grazing’s quick and intense rotation is said to evenly fertilise the ground, boost the health of the plants, and increase the depth of their roots. Healthy plants mean higher levels of photosynthesis and therefore higher levels of carbon dioxide drawn from the atmosphere. In turn, this carbon is ‘captured’ either in the plant’s cells as it grows or in the surrounding soil.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isn’t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
79d03212-2508-45d0-b427-8e9743ff6432
Viewpoint: The Casey Means hustle—Wellness woo opportunism dressed up as medical wisdom
d-b
Blocked arteries, kidney stones, nausea, constipation, fatigue: Long list of health problems caused by too much vitamin D 
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-04-30-at-11.33.46-AM
Anti-seed-oil to anti-vax pipeline: MAHA movement spreads to teen influencers
lab grown meat research kelly schultz lehighuniversity main
Profiles of the 10 top global cultured meat companies
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-30-2026-05_00_48-PM
Wellness grifter physician turned wellness influencer out as surgeon general nominee
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-30-2026-12_21_05-PM-2
The tech billionaires behind the immortality movement
Screenshot-2026-04-28-at-1.21.37-PM
How America’s medical system encourages psychiatric overdiagnosis
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-27-2026-11_27_05-AM
The myths of “process”: What science says about the “dangers’ of synthetic products and ultra-processed foods

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.