Viewpoint: Philippines’ food security crisis will continue to deepen without disruptive biotechnology innovations

The anti-GM lobby has been successfuly in stifling development of biotechnology in the Phillippines. Credit: Greenpeace
The anti-GM lobby has been successfuly in stifling development of biotechnology in the Phillippines. Credit: Greenpeace

A major yield breakthrough in corn has occurred due to the introduction of hybrid seed which can be further galvanised and made cost-effective by using GM hybrids containing a stack of useful genes.

The health and opportunity cost of the malnourished (deficient calories, Vitamin A, iron, zinc) population is far greater than the potential threat of cancers. The malnourished population is predisposed to cancer-causing chemicals and environmental hazards, while there are convincing data to support a reduction in the use of chemicals with the introduction of GM crops. If GM poses any threat to our lives, we are already into it since the introduction of Bt cotton.

Our food security crisis will continue to deepen unless some disruptive technology applications are adopted. The application of ICTs, data sciences and GM crops are disruptive for good reasons. But there are regulatory and public perception problems.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.
[The Phillippines] are a country of 220 million people importing essential commodities worth $10 billion a year. It is extremely important to dispel unfounded misgivings against scientifically, environmentally and economically viable technologies. The law of the land permits the introduction of GM-crops including soybean. There are unfair hurdles that need to be removed. I propose an open debate in the media and advocacy for appropriate policy interventions to avoid deepening the food security crisis, by putting political preferences aside.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.