‘Animals are very smart, but not in the same way as us’: Explaining differences between human and animal intelligence

‘Animals are very smart, but not in the same way as us’: Explaining the differences between human and animal intelligence
Credit: Pexels/ Sam Lion

Glenn-Peter Sætre is a biologist and researcher on evolution – that is, how animals and plants have evolved on Earth.

“Animals can be very smart, but not necessarily in the same way as us,” he says.

They cannot read and do math, but to survive in a world that can be dangerous and difficult, they must be smart in other ways.

How will they find food? How can they avoid danger?

“I think we often underestimate and look down on animals. They are not dumb, just different,” Sætre says.

“Does evolution make species smarter and give them higher IQs?”

“Both yes and no. It is not always intelligence and IQ that lead to evolution,” Sætre says.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

“There are species with larger brains than us. For example, the blue whale. But we are still smarter,” Sætre says.

“Why is that?”

“The reason is that our brain is very efficiently packed. It is knotty like a walnut. How it is packed is more important than the size,” he says.

According to Sætre, the human brain requires a lot of energy.

The brain accounts for about 2 per cent of our body weight. Even so, it uses around 20 per cent of our energy when we are completely relaxed.

This is an excerpt. Read the full article here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot 2026-05-26 at 10.15
Viewpoint: Double standard—Why does the wellness industry get a free pass while Big Healthcare is treated as morally suspect?
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-4-2026-11_49_36-AM-2
‘You don’t understand Tolkien’: Skeptic Pope trolls tech giants about the exaggerated, risk-less benefits of AI
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-4-2026-01_27_58-PM
Viewpoint—N.A.D.+: Why Gwenyth Paltrow’s heralded anti-aging supplement doesn’t work
Screenshot-2026-06-03-at-1.24.46-PM
Challenging anti-GMO disinformation: Why genetically-tweaked crops offer bushels of benefits
Screenshot-2026-06-04-at-12.05.08-PM
Cases of brain inflammation surge as U.S. measles pandemic approaches 2000
Screenshot 2025-07-30 at 10.48
Can gene editing eliminate Down syndrome? Scientists have done it in lab-grown cells
ChatGPT Image May 26, 2026, 08_42_17 AM (1)
Viewpoint: Greenpeace and poison: How environmental advocacy groups rely on compliant (and often ignorant) journalists to spread disinformation and spark litigation
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
downsyndrome_compilation_MID_1
CRISPR breakthrough that can remove the chromosome responsible for Down syndrome raises ethical questions
tick-DNA
GLP podcast: Spread meat allergy with gene-edited ticks? Bioethicists pose vile ‘thought experiment’
ChatGPT Image May 26, 2026, 08_21_36 AM
Limiting gender affirming interventions: Trump administration targets Texas even though it already bans youth access

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.