Developing ‘revolutionary’ drugs — This company has spent a billion dollars over 25 years and has come up empty. What now?

Developing ‘revolutionary’ drugs — This company has spent a billion dollars over 25 years and has come up empty. What now?
Credit: Unsplash/ Anastasiia Gudantova

The headline on the cover of the San Francisco Business Times told it all.

“Running on Empty: What do you do when 25 years and a billion dollars have not produced an approved drug?”

It was a clear illustration of the enormously expensive task and challenges involved in developing cutting-edge therapies — an illustration that applies as well to the $12 billion California stem cell and gene therapy program. It too has yet to finance an approved stem cell or gene therapy treatment during its 18 years of work and the expenditure of $3.5 billion from California taxpayers.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

“By some estimates, only one in 10 drugs that make it into clinical trials survives the financial, clinical and regulatory gauntlet to come out the other side with an approved drug, a process that typically takes a decade or more,” [said reporter Ron Leuty].

Hope, however, does not burn eternal. At some point, the three companies and [The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, or] CIRM are going to need more cash. In the case of CIRM, it will need to appeal to voters to save its program. The question is whether the voters will buy the deal.

This is an excerpt. Read the full article here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
global warming
‘Implausible’: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenario—soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-12.15.17-PM
UK gene-editing milestone: Livestock barley that increases ruminant value and reduces methane emissions is first-approved CRISPR crop
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-3.15.53-PM
Chiropractors may no longer be modern-day snake oil salesmen, but the benefits of their therapy are limited–at best

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.