Developing ‘revolutionary’ drugs — This company has spent a billion dollars over 25 years and has come up empty. What now?

Developing ‘revolutionary’ drugs — This company has spent a billion dollars over 25 years and has come up empty. What now?
Credit: Unsplash/ Anastasiia Gudantova

The headline on the cover of the San Francisco Business Times told it all.

“Running on Empty: What do you do when 25 years and a billion dollars have not produced an approved drug?”

It was a clear illustration of the enormously expensive task and challenges involved in developing cutting-edge therapies — an illustration that applies as well to the $12 billion California stem cell and gene therapy program. It too has yet to finance an approved stem cell or gene therapy treatment during its 18 years of work and the expenditure of $3.5 billion from California taxpayers.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

“By some estimates, only one in 10 drugs that make it into clinical trials survives the financial, clinical and regulatory gauntlet to come out the other side with an approved drug, a process that typically takes a decade or more,” [said reporter Ron Leuty].

Hope, however, does not burn eternal. At some point, the three companies and [The California Institute for Regenerative Medicine, or] CIRM are going to need more cash. In the case of CIRM, it will need to appeal to voters to save its program. The question is whether the voters will buy the deal.

This is an excerpt. Read the full article here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-30-2026-01_09_47-PM
Viewpoint: As MAHA blows up over Supreme Court ruling limiting glyphosate litigation, Trump offers toothless plan to reduce pesticides in food
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-23-2026-12_19_35-PM
Ideological red flag: Led by anti-vax doctor, Tennessee is now the U.S. epicenter selling potent ivermectin shown worthless to prevent or treat Covid
Screenshot-2026-06-30-at-3.08.03-PM
From infrared sauna blankets to collagen gummies, here’s the top 10 social-media-promoted wellness shams
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-01_14_50-PM
Viewpoint: Disinformation grift: The wellness industry is a lucrative and mostly worthless marketplace of ‘balms, brews, and baloney’
Screenshot-2026-06-30-at-10.43.50-AM
Viewpoint: Why are there no approved bioengineered insect-protected (Bt) apples?
photodune farming tractor s
Viewpoint: Glyphosate may be hazardous, but it is not dangerous as used by farmers. Critics of the Supreme Court’s Roundup ruling garble hazard with risk
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-4-2026-09_39_03-AM
Transgender female athletes and Title IX: Separating ‘policy’ from ‘legality’
Screenshot-2026-06-30-at-2.06.25-PM
PEW study: The sick state of American health information
Screenshot-2026-06-17-at-12.31.01-PM
Viewpoint: The dangerous influence of ‘woke’ post-modernism in science
marijuana-pot-in-hand-nveri-st-xpm-t-abq-fkifeos-s-rws-cmpx-
Facts & Fallacies podcast: Legalized weed drives drug addiction, psychosis?
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-30-2026-02_48_10-PM
Independent news review site launches free credibility and fact-vetted aggregation chatbot

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.