Biological crop treatments: Farmers divided on whether they’re breakthroughs on the horizon or ‘snake oil’?

Soil bacteria can be engineered to perform useful tasks on farms. Credit: HansN. via CC-BY-SA-3.0
Soil bacteria can be engineered to perform useful tasks on farms. Credit: HansN. via CC-BY-SA-3.0

Whenever the topic of microbiological crop protection products comes up, the words “snake oil” can appear. Biologicals are said to hold great promise as a powerful tool for farmers to move beyond synthetic pesticides and fertilizers, but they are still in their infancy, experiencing growing pains.

Katie Barnhill is a senior research scholar with the Genetic Engineering and Society Center at North Carolina State University. She has done extensive interviews with farmers on the use of microbiological crop production inoculants, and explained farmers remain hesitant, due to continued skepticism on the products’ efficacy.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

For biologicals to be adopted by farmers, Barnhill notes that they must work and be as affordable as synthetic crop protection products. Farmers must also have complete trust in biologicals before they turn to them, and the products must offer a return on investment. 

She said the challenge is that previous microbial products did not deliver on the promise of dramatically improved yields. She said it is critical that biologicals not be treated as “silver bullets.” They should serve as an additional management tool for farmers rather than a replacement for existing resources. 

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Diet Soda with Measuring Tape 2
Science challenges anti-soda activists: No, sodas won’t make you fat
Strawberry Clamshell with Warning Sticker
Viewpoint: Activists hype ‘dangerous level’ of pesticide residues in Driscoll berries: Separating health concerns from fear-mongering
Silhouettes Beneath the Mosquito Nets
Guinea-Bissau halts widely condemned RFK Jr.-backed vaccine trial that would have withheld life-saving vaccines from thousands of newborns
Rustic Skillet of Raw Brains
‘Weird food’? Testicle- and brain-eating, supplement-gulping MAHA health food enthusiasts defend their ‘natural’ diets
psychedelics ptsd neurosciencnews public
Chaos or at peace with the world: The complex ways psychedelics transform the brain
Justice Under Prideful Skies
Supreme Court blocks Trump’s order halting transgender surgeries and hormone treatments for inmates
Author-Presenting-Good-Energy
'Disillusioned': Controversial RFK Jr. ally and MAHA leader Calley Means quits Trump advisory role
Generations United for Immunization
Police raid Guinea-Bissau offices of RFK Jr.-backed vaccine researchers, seize hepatitis B doses
png_cheese_Raw_milk
100% raw milk, 100% misguided: As MAHA-fueled demand for unpasteurized milk soars, American Academy of Pediatrics renews call for a ban on its sale and distribution
Screenshot-2026-10-21-at-10.38.39-AM
Viewpoint: The libertarian case for getting the government out of the business of regulating food choices
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.