Electrocuting weeds: Environmental and health concerns over herbicide use sparks quest for new solutions

Credit: Garford Farm Machinery
Credit: Garford Farm Machinery

As concerns over chemical usage and weed resistance increase, different technologies have been offered as alternatives to weed control. Recently, two U.K.-based companies have teamed up to produce a system that uses electricity to kill weeds.

“The principle of electric weeding has been around since the late 1800s,” says Jonathan Henry, managing director at Garford Farm Machinery. “So as an operating principle, it’s not a new one.

“The way it works is by passing current through the plant. It heats the fluid in the plant cells, vaporizes them and that damages the plant cells. Basically, after that happens the plant dries out, desiccates and dies.”

Garford, which has been building row-crop tillage equipment, has partnered with RootWave, which developed the electrical technology. Together, they’re introducing the “eWeeding” technology to the market, starting in the U.K., with plans to expand it to North America. It will eventually be marketed here through Garford’s existing dealer network.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

“One of the questions that often comes up from customers, does it have a negative impact on the biology of the soil?” he says. “Rootwave and others have done quite a bit of work in that space and none of those studies have detected any negative impact on the other soil biology, micro fauna, nematodes, fungi, bacteria, et cetera.

“There are multiple paths for the electricity to return; it’s such a large mass, therefore there is no significant heating in the soil structure. So it does what you want. It kills the weed and doesn’t hurt anything else.”

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-1.29.41-PM
Viewpoint: What happens when whole grains meet modern food manufacturing? Labels don’t tell the whole story.
S
As vaccine rejectionism spreads, measles may be taking a more dangerous turn
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-27-2026-11_47_30-AM-2
FDA’s expedited drug reviews are hailed in some quarters but other approval practices are problematic
Screenshot 2026-05-06 at 2.56
Singularity crisis ahead? Can super babies save us from rogue AI geniuses?
Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-2.26.27-PM
Viewpoint — Food-fear world: The latest activist scientists campaign: Cancer-causing additives
Farmers can talk to plants
Farmers are a major source of misinformation—about farming
Screenshot-2026-04-30-at-2.19.37-PM
5 myths about summer dehydration that could damage your health — or even kill you
Screenshot-2026-05-06-at-2.07.43-PM
Manufacturing a conspiracy: The timeline of how  the White House embraced the fringe claim that scientists are being mysteriously murdered
Screenshot-2026-03-13-at-12.14.04-PM
The FDA wants to make many popular prescription drugs OTC—a great idea. Here’s why it’s unlikely to happen
Screenshot 2026-05-06 at 2.19
Vaccine shootout at the CDC 
Screenshot-2026-04-03-at-11.15.51-AM
Paraben panic: How a flawed study, media hype, and chemophobia convinced the public of the danger of one of the safest classes of preservatives
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.