Chinese consumers open to gene-edited foods

Credit: wlafrica via CC-BY-SA-4.0
Credit: wlafrica via CC-BY-SA-4.0

Experts from the School of Communication, Soochow University in China, surveyed over 600 consumers in China to solicit their perceptions of gene-edited food. The results of the survey are published in Foods journal.

Gene editing is one of the emerging tools of gene technology used to develop novel foods for food security. However, the acceptance and adoption of such novel foods will be based on public perception of gene editing. Thus, the researchers used the knowledgeโ€“attitudeโ€“practice model and constructed an integrated framework comprising four dimensions: demographic factors, scientific literacy and beliefs, social trust, and perceptions of gene technology, aimed at explaining the public’s attitudes toward GE foods.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Questionnaires were distributed to 649 respondents from China. The results showed a favorable attitude toward gene-edited food, with over 80% expressing willingness to pay for such products. Income level, subjective knowledge, scientific beliefs, trust in scientists, trust in government, and trust in national technological capabilities and perceived benefits were positively correlated with the willingness to pay. Furthermore, the impact of objective knowledge on attitudes toward gene-edited foods exhibited a significant, nonlinear relationship.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Picture1
The FDA couldnโ€™t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesnโ€™t change the scienceโ€”the worldโ€™s most popular herbicide is safeย 
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_32_36-PM
Viewpoint: The state of U.S. vaccine policy? Dismal nationally, but some states are stepping up.
placebo
Viewpoint โ€” Alternative medicine and the placebo effect: Selling a reassuring illusion of health
_20250221_nib_rfk_trump
Viewpoint: 'Crisis of public trust': Autism support community shocked RFK continues to peddle false claims about the danger of vaccines
ChatGPT-Image-May-18-2026-01_45_05-PM-2
Newest hantavirus conspiracy: Online disinformation turns outbreak into latest ivermectin grift
Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-1.39.26-PM
Viewpoint: โ€˜Safer for children?โ€™ Stonyfield yogurt under fire for deceptive organic marketing
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-10.46.29-AM
Viewpoint: How to counter science disinformation? Science journalist offers 12 practical tips
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_16_37-PM-2
Viewpoint: Are cancer rates โ€˜skyrocketingโ€™ as RFK, Jr. and MAHA claim? The evidence says mostly the opposite
the magic of mRNA
Viewpoint: Anti-vax fake โ€˜turbo cancerโ€™ claims threaten cancer treatment breakthroughs
Defense_Secretary_Ash_Carter_tours_the_Microsoft_Cybercrime_Center_in_Seattle_March_3_2016
How criminals are using AI to target social media users and steal their money and confidential data
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.