Chinese consumers open to gene-edited foods

Credit: wlafrica via CC-BY-SA-4.0
Credit: wlafrica via CC-BY-SA-4.0

Experts from the School of Communication, Soochow University in China, surveyed over 600 consumers in China to solicit their perceptions of gene-edited food. The results of the survey are published in Foods journal.

Gene editing is one of the emerging tools of gene technology used to develop novel foods for food security. However, the acceptance and adoption of such novel foods will be based on public perception of gene editing. Thus, the researchers used the knowledge–attitude–practice model and constructed an integrated framework comprising four dimensions: demographic factors, scientific literacy and beliefs, social trust, and perceptions of gene technology, aimed at explaining the public’s attitudes toward GE foods.

Mis- and disinformation are distorting science and public policy. Subscribe to our Daily and Weekly Digests for incisive coverage of ‘disruptive’ innovations in AI, agricultural biotechnology, food, chemicals, nuclear energy, vaccines, and other disruptive innovations.

Questionnaires were distributed to 649 respondents from China. The results showed a favorable attitude toward gene-edited food, with over 80% expressing willingness to pay for such products. Income level, subjective knowledge, scientific beliefs, trust in scientists, trust in government, and trust in national technological capabilities and perceived benefits were positively correlated with the willingness to pay. Furthermore, the impact of objective knowledge on attitudes toward gene-edited foods exhibited a significant, nonlinear relationship.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Wave Crest Over Red Cross
Viewpoint: Here are the election-inspired Trump administration healthcare policy reversals expected in the coming months
Bayer Crop Circle in Golden Wheat
Making fertilizer from thin air: Bayer’s gene-editing innovation could dramatically cut chemical fertilizer use in growing food
p22_spraying_2
How climate change is driving increased pesticide usage
Blue Checklist in Centered Hand
Viewpoint: From Medicaid cuts to MAHA-backed anti-vaccine and chemical hysteria, voters reject Republicans’ science-skeptical agenda
Aerial Sprayer Over Gradient Fields
Farming, food, and chemicals: Post-midterms, the MAHA alliance between Democrats and MAGA Republicans is bruised but not cowed. What comes next?
Democratic Donkey Plowing at Sunset
Viewpoint: Democratic tsunami: As the red tide recedes, here are the most likely shifts in food and agricultural policy
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-2-2026-02_03_32-PM
How much of a problem is AI’s water use?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.