Claims of living well past 100 turn out to be mostly bogus

1ee3610b-902f-472c-b967-e415c30e003b

The allure of extreme longevity has beckoned for centuries. Research careers and marketing campaigns have been built on the idea that we can live longer, healthier lives by emulating long-lived people. It is a comforting thought, frequently used for research funding bids and to sell cookbooks.

Unfortunately, the data on people living to an unusually old age is deeply flawed. Iย tracked downย data on 80 percent of the worldโ€™s people 110 or older and found that in many cases their advanced age is highly improbable. The errors in the data were striking.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Many of the worldโ€™s oldest people are reported to be alive on paper long after they died. The first man to โ€œsurviveโ€ past 110 actually died at 65, and nobody noticed the mistake for a century. Tokyoโ€™s oldest man was really entombed in his apartment for 30 years while his family took his pension. Japanese people incinerated by American World War II bombings have โ€œsurvivedโ€ for decades in a filing cabinet as administrative zombies, their cultural practices appropriated by Westerners to sell books on their supposed survival secrets like ikigai, the Japanese concept of finding purpose in life, and the purported health benefits of purple sweet potatoes.

These findings raise much bigger questions about how false claims about longevity and supercentenarians could persist for so long. Too few people in academia or among the general public have questioned how a man with no identifying documents living in a Venezuelan jungle could outlive every athlete, rich Swiss mountaineer and yogurt-slurping weekend warrior on Earth.
After years of open criticism, basic problems remain unexplained. Instead, the science of extreme longevity continues as an immense joke.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_16_37-PM-2
Viewpoint: Are cancer rates โ€˜skyrocketingโ€™ as RFK, Jr. and MAHA claims? The evidence says mostly the opposite
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-10.46.29-AM
Viewpoint: How to counter science disinformation? Science journalist offers 12 practical tips
Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-1.39.26-PM
Viewpoint: โ€˜Safer for children?โ€™ Stonyfield yogurt under fire for deceptive organic marketing

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.