GLP podcast: ‘Big Pharma’ owns the FDA? Challenging a cherished MAHA myth

Listen to GLP Science Facts & Fallacies on iTunes, Spotify, Podbean and YouTube Podcasts. Or add the RSS feed to your favorite podcast app. Join our GLP Daily Digest to get these stories and more delivered to your inbox.

v facts and fallacies cameron and liza default featured image outlined
It’s a widely believed myth spread by wellness gurus, Hollywood stars, politicians and even many scientists: the pharmaceutical industry “owns” the  Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This cherished belief profoundly influences the public’s perception of modern medicine, but it’s wrong in almost all its particulars. While the FDA interacts closely with the pharmaceutical industry—which it’s required to do by law—there’s no credible evidence to suggest ownership or total control. A closer look at the facts on the ground reveals a complex system driven by competing political interests that often works against industry, sometimes to the public’s benefit and other times to our detriment.

Surveying how the FDA functions helps to confirm that point. The cost in time and money to commercialize a new pharmaceutical is beyond staggering. According to one recent estimate, taking a drug from discovery through FDA approval and getting it into pharmacies carries a price tag north of $1 billion and can take 10 to 15 years. Underscoring how difficult the process is to complete, the FDA approved just 355 therapeutic drugs and biologic agents between 2009 and 2018.

Indeed, only 1 in 1000 compounds that enter laboratory testing actually make it to the FDA review process. The agency’s regulatory framework is far from perfectwith some experts arguing it’s actually far too expensive and cumbersomeand often limits patient access to medicines that could save lives. Nevertheless, these flaws are hardly evidence that FDA rubber-stamps new drug applications or does the bidding of industry.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

While there are undeniable cases of Big Pharma malfeasance in drug development and marketing (which should be punished), far less attention is paid to the rampant misdeeds of wellness gurus who market fad diet books, untested supplements and any number of questionable lifestyle products. It’s these activists with enormous financial conflicts of interest who so often drive the narrative of a pharma-dominated FDA, and who have increasing influence over federal health policy.

This prompts an important question: is industry influence over federal regulations universally dangerous, or is it OK when “health coaches” and trial lawyers like Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. shape policy? Join Dr. Liza Dunn and Cam English on this episode of Facts and Fallacies as they tackle that messy issue.

Dr. Liza Dunn is a medical toxicologist and the medical affairs lead at Bayer Crop Science. Follow her on X @DrLizaMD

Cameron J. English is the director of bio-sciences at the American Council on Science and Health. Visit his website and follow him on X @camjenglish

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}
Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.