Stinky plants: The evolutionary explanation

Credit: Wikimedia
Credit: Wikimedia

Not all flowers emit odors that are enticing to humans. Three types of flowering plants โ€“ Asarum simile,ย Eurya japonica, andย Symplocarpus renifoliusย โ€“ smell like decaying meat or excrement, thanks to an enzyme, disulfide synthase. Itโ€™s the enzyme implicated in halitosis (bad breath) in humans and brings to mind Lynyrd Skynyrdโ€™s classic โ€œOoh, that smell. The smell of death surrounds you.โ€

A new report inย Science, from Yudai Okuyama and co-workers at the University of Tokyo, reveals how an initial change long ago in the enzyme altered floral odor in a way that opened a niche for novel pollinators.

From Kipling to Darwin

Stinky flowers provide another example of the โ€œJust-Soโ€ stories that English journalist, novelist, and poet Rudyard Kipling published in 1902.

Kiplingโ€™s fanciful explanations of nature helped to hook me on science as a very young child. He famously explained โ€œhow the leopard got its spots,โ€ โ€œhow the camel got his hump,โ€ and โ€œhow the rhinoceros got his skin.โ€

Nowadays discoveries in genetics provide looks back in time to how traits arose and came to persist. DNA Science has covered several genetic just-so stories:ย How the Pangolin Got its Scales,ย How the Giraffe Got its Spots,ย How the Tabby Got its Stripes,ย andย How the Human Lost its Tail.

Kiplingโ€™s tales inspired me to think like Darwin about how distinctive traits came to be. A new trait doesnโ€™t arise from a purposeful action on the part of the leopard, camel, rhino, cat, or flowering plant. Instead, natural selection favors a beneficial inherited trait, perhaps due to a new mutation, leading to increased prevalence.

But how are certain traits beneficial? Thatโ€™s where imagination comes in.

A leopardโ€™s spots and tabbyโ€™s stripes?ย Camouflage.

A pangolinโ€™s armored long nose?ย Shields and also protects against skin infection.

Our distant ancestorsโ€™ disappearing tails?ย Ability to stand upright and eventually walk.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Organic Chemistry Explains That Smell

The distinctive rotten-flesh odor of anย Asarumย flower arises from organic reactions โ€“ organicโ€™s original meaning of carbon-containing compounds, not the co-opted popular term.

The molecule responsible for the floral stench is dimethyldisulfide (DMDS). It forms spontaneously during metabolism when a smaller molecule, methanethiol, (methane plus sulfur, the stuff of farts) links into doublets (dimerizes).

What the researchers added was identifying an overactive gene in the flowers. The gene encodes a protein that binds the element selenium. In humans, the protein detoxes methanethiol (from the first step), releasing hydrogen peroxide, hydrogen sulfide, and formaldehyde in the process. People with mutations in this gene have a trait calledย cabbage breath.

But in plants, the biochemistry differs. Instead of emitting the trio of compounds like humans do,ย Asarumย flowers release the extremely foul-smelling (to us) DMDS. Long, long ago, a distant shared ancestor of the three modern odoriferous species mutated in a way that tweaked metabolism to release DMDS. When certain pollinators found it delectable, those plants had a reproductive advantage, and came to persist.

The novel odor arose by a common mechanism in evolution โ€“ gene duplication. Like hanging onto an old laptop as a back-up when purchasing a new one, evolution sometimes โ€œtries outโ€ a new function in a duplicate gene without extinguishing the original geneโ€™s activity.

CODA: Evolution Does Not Have a Purpose

Elegant experiments led to the explanation of how certain plants acquired an odor similar to cabbage, smelly feet, farts, and rotten flesh.ย  Unfortunately, an accompanyingย Perspectiveย from Lorenzo Caputi and Sarah E. Oโ€™Connor, of the Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology in Germany, makes the common errors in explaining evolution that feed the misconception that it is goal-oriented.

Evolution does not have a purpose. Would bacteria, worms, cacti, fungi, acquire novel characteristics because they simply wanted to?

Caputi and Oโ€™Connor also lapse into fanciful anthropomorphism, deeming the odorย โ€œa strategic deception in which insects that normally feed on decaying organic matter are tricked into paying a visit to these flowers, which results in inadvertent polliยญnation by the insects. Hence, the inclusion of these sulfur-containing molecules has allowed the plants to hijack insect behaviors while ofยญfering nothing to the insects in return.โ€

The accompanying news release fromย Scienceย isnโ€™t much better:ย โ€œSome plants lure pollinators not with sweet fragrances, but with the rank stench of decay. In a new study, researchers show how plants pull this off.โ€ย And weโ€™re back to the just-so stories.

Mutations happen at random, a consequence of chemistry. If a genetic change provides a helpful trait variation โ€“ like a rotten odor delectable to certain insect pollinators โ€“ then it persists because those plants have a reproductive advantage. More insects visit them.

In these days of cuts to scientific research and to universities, it is more important than ever to communicate experimental findings using appropriate language โ€“ thereโ€™s no need to dumb down the science.

Ricki Lewis has a PhD in genetics and is a science writer and author of several human genetics books.ย She is an adjunct professor for the Alden March Bioethics Institute at Albany Medical College.ย Follow her at herย website

A version of this article was originally posted atย PLOS Blogsย and has been reposted here with permission. Any reposting should credit the original author and provide links to both the GLP and the original article. Find PLOS Blogs on Xย @PLOS
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isnโ€™t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
ChatGPT-Image-Feb-16-2026-01_57_31-PM
Viewpoint: โ€˜Science-as-Satanโ€™ unites the MAHAโ€”MAGA movements. Is a breakup in the works?
d-b
Blocked arteries, kidney stones, nausea, constipation, fatigue: Long list of health problems caused by too much vitamin Dย 
bayer-supremecourt-lt
EPA concludes glyphosate is not carcinogenic. Missouri courts say Monsanto failed to warn it might be. SCOTUS weighs in.
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-22-2026-11_06_18-AM
Wellness influencer nonsense: No, nicotine does not boost cognition and productivity, but it can damage your healthย 
Screenshot-2026-04-27-at-12.22.38-PM
Running โ€˜wildโ€™: Last year, RFK, Jr. was given a green light to โ€˜reformโ€™ chemical policies. Glyphosate illustrates how Trump now has him on a tight leash, and MAHA is furious
Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-3.54.04-PM
AI disinformation stress test: Challenges and response strategies
ChatGPT-Image-Feb-16-2026-01_04_32-PM
Raw milk myth wake-up call
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-11-2026-11_58_46-AM
The Trump administration has run out more than 4,000 National Institutes of Health employees. Here are the consequences
Screenshot-2026-04-27-at-1.40.55-PM
With federal funding for scientific research already reeling, Trump fires the entire apolitical National Science Board
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.