Viewpoint: How corporations and governments drive disinformation and downplay the human role in climate change

As the Earth continues to warm [primarily because of human activity] and the impacts on our climate grow increasingly severe, the science that seeks to warn and guide us is being silenced. 

In only 30 years, climate science has advanced from being able to discern human influence on global climate to being able to calculate the cost of one specific impact (heat) caused by one company’s emissions. … This is the state of the science that climate deniers seek to silence. 

In different countries around the world, corporations and politicians deploy the “disinformation playbook” against science-based policymaking. A process that allows science to inform policy has three stages, but each of these stages faces a predictable set of disinforming tactics designed to undermine policy action ….

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

Research from the Union of Concerned Scientists and others demonstrates that the fossil fuel industry has used every tactic in the disinformation playbook:

  1. Hiring a scientist who used discredited methods and did not disclose industry funding  
  2. Manufacturing doubt by exaggerating uncertainties in climate change science and targeting teachers and students
  3. Harassing climate scientists
  4. Buying credibility
  5. Manipulating government officials 

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
global warming
‘Implausible’: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenario—soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-12.15.17-PM
UK gene-editing milestone: Livestock barley that increases ruminant value and reduces methane emissions is first-approved CRISPR crop
vax-misinformation-main
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Limit free speech to blunt social media misinfo?
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
Screenshot-2026-05-21-at-3.15.53-PM
Chiropractors may no longer be modern-day snake oil salesmen, but the benefits of their therapy are limited–at best
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research shows—but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
Screenshot-2026-05-20-at-5.11.17-PM
Viewpoint: No, sugar doesn’t ‘feed’ cancer — common cancer myths, debunked

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.