Viewpoint: Trump derides climate research. Here’s how scientists are fighting back

As climate change has grown from a distant threat to a present danger, federal support for global change research also grew: from about $1 billion in 1990 to $2.6 billion per year in the 2010s, peaking at $4.3 billion in 2023. …

Then came the second Trump administration.

… As part of its broader politicization of nonpartisan institutions and subordination of evidence to political goals, it has scorned climate science and promoted disinformation about what it calls “climate alarmism.”

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

But the scientific community is fighting back. …

When the Trump administration shut down the Sixth National Climate Assessment, [American Geophysical Union] and the American Meteorological Society launched a cross-journal U.S. Climate Collection to solicit synthesis papers that will inform future assessments of climate risks and solutions in the U.S. This project (for which I’m now on the steering committee) is not a substitute for the legally required National Climate Assessment, which needs tens of millions of dollars and extensive stakeholder engagement to do properly. But it’s an opportunity to strengthen the foundations for future assessments—perhaps even to think about how assessments can be done better in the future.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
global warming
‘Implausible’: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenario—soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.