Bad things can happen when food companies listen to anti-GMO activists instead of consumers

In removing genetically modified ingredients from Cheerios, General Mills joins the growing number of companies that are bending, not to the demands of their loyal female base, the leading purchasers in the consumer market, but to a very vocal and media-savvy minority of radical activists determined to frighten women โ€” particularly mothers โ€” about GM food.

While it is understandable that food companies, like General Mills, Chipotle, Ben & Jerry’s, and Whole Foods, are desperate to find a way to please their critics, especially the powerful anti-GM movement, it appears these companies have settled on a strategy combining meek contrition (we’re sorry we use perfectly safe GM ingredients) and appeasement (we’ll get rid of perfectly safe GM ingredients in someโ€ฆbut not allโ€ฆproducts).

Anti-GM activists aren’t the only ones who will benefit from General Mills’ well-meaning but naรฏve move. Food activists have a long menu of grievances. From sugar and high-fructose corn syrup to artificial flavors and colors, trans-fats, salt and preservatives, General Mills just provided the food police the blueprint for success.

A better solution for companies is to listen to their actual customers โ€” women who want choices in the marketplace and access to both healthy and affordable food. Food companies would be wise to defend the products Americans love and to stand firm against the nonsense peddled by alarmists.

Read the full, original story:ย General Mills caves to the food police: Column

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot 2026-05-26 at 10.15
Viewpoint: Double standardโ€”Why does the wellness industry get a free pass while Big Healthcare is treated as morally suspect?
Screenshot-2026-06-03-at-3.33.44-PM
Viewpoint: Vaccine deniers are attacking a life-saving Vitamin K shot for newborns that isnโ€™t even a vaccine
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-1.44.09-PM
Viewpoint: Scientists have scrapped the worst-case climate scenario. Is that proof that climate change is a hoax, as Trump claims?
Screenshot-2026-06-08-at-1.35.30-PM
Viewpoint: Social media and fake natural health propaganda fuel surge in use of mostly useless supplements
px extra strength tylenol and tylenol pm
Why โ€˜null-findingsโ€™ on Tylenolโ€™s safety for pregnant women barely move the needle on countering misinformation
Screenshot 2025-08-25 203032
Mazzengaโ€™s 20-year old muscles: How a still-going-strong 92-year old sprinter wins every race she enters
Screenshot-2026-06-08-at-10.19.30-AM
โ€˜Naturalโ€™ wellness supplements linked to liver injury
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-10-2026-12_57_24-PM
Viewpoint: Why gene-editing babies is moral and certain to happen
ChatGPT-Image-May-28-2026-12_56_54-PM
Viewpoint: Vaccines' non-specific effects? The โ€˜shoddyโ€™ Danish couple whose 'researchโ€™ inspires RFK, Jr.โ€™s health delusion
Screen Shot at AM
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Right-wing politics bad for your health? Separating speculation from science
Credit: ACSH
Viewpoint: Who and whatโ€™s to blame for the surge in vaccine-preventable diseases?
Screenshot 2026-06-10 at 2.06
Debunking vs. Restoring Trust: New and better strategies to fight deliberate disinformation
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.