We know moms shouldn’t drink while pregnant. Now there’s evidence that drinking dads can damage children’s brain development too

Credit: Get Archive
Credit: Get Archive

For more than 50 years, scientists have warned about the risks of drinking alcohol in pregnancy. Recent research has found that a mother’s consumption of as little as one drink a week may affect a child’s brain development, cognitive function and behaviour, and facial shape, while for decades, public health campaigns have repeatedly said that there’s no safe amount of alcohol for mums to drink while pregnant.

Follow the latest news and policy debates on sustainable agriculture, biomedicine, and other ‘disruptive’ innovations. Subscribe to our newsletter.

“For years now, we’ve been hearing stories from women who said, ‘I never drank during pregnancy, but now I have an FAS kid – and my male partner was a chronic alcohol abuser’,” [Michael Golding, a developmental physiologist at Texas A&M University] says. But such stories often were dismissed as mothers being forgetful, if not outright lying.

Recent research, however, raises an intriguing – and possibly game-changing – possibility: these mothers were right all along.

The idea that a father’s alcohol consumption before conception could have an impact on the offspring may seem far-fetched. But recent population studies have found that babies whose fathers drank are at a higher risk for various poor health outcomes. One 2021 observational study of more than half a million couples in China, for example, found that the risk of birth defects – including cleft palate, congenital heart disease, and digestive tract anomalies – was higher if the father drank before conception, even when the mother did not drink. Another population study from China compared 5,000 children with congenital heart defects to 5,000 without. Again, while overall risk remained relatively low, it found that babies were nearly three times more likely to have a congenital heart defect if their father drank – defined as having more than 50ml (1.7fl oz) of alcohol per day in the three months before pregnancy – than if he didn’t.

This is an excerpt. Read the original post here

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT Image Jun 3, 2026, 03_54_37 PM
Viewpoint: “Turn on, tune in, drop out”—Kennedy embraces the Timothy Leary psychedelic revolution
ChatGPT Image Jun 3, 2026, 03_14_43 PM
Viewpoint: How Earthjustice became the poster child for the abuse of special interest activist funding
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-11-2026-01_15_03-PM
Selective Pressure, Selective Silence
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
ChatGPT Image Jun 1, 2026, 11_39_17 AM
Viewpoint: When food myths go viral, farmers pay the price
Screenshot-2026-06-03-at-1.24.46-PM
Challenging anti-GMO disinformation: Why genetically-tweaked crops offer bushels of benefits
ChatGPT Image May 26, 2026, 08_42_17 AM (1)
Viewpoint: Greenpeace and poison: How environmental advocacy groups rely on compliant (and often ignorant) journalists to spread disinformation and spark litigation
Screenshot 2026-05-26 at 10.15
Viewpoint: Double standard—Why does the wellness industry get a free pass while Big Healthcare is treated as morally suspect?
Screenshot-2026-05-28-at-1.36.28-PM
Viewpoint: Can mRNA research survive the Trump administration?

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.