Steve Savage, a plant pathologist working with agricultural technology, gives his explanation of why voters should absolutely vote ‘no’ on Prop 37 in California’s election this November. Savage, who is pro-GM, believes that GMO labeling is ‘illogical’ and will do more harm than good. He gives, what he believes, are several ‘good’ reasons to vote no on Prop 37, and aims to inform potential voters on the science behind GMOs and agricultural biotechnology.
GMOs and California: To label or not to label?
Steve Savage | August 27, 2012
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}
Infographics | More... |
Are pesticide residues on food something to worry about?
In 1962, Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring drew attention to pesticides and their possible dangers to humans, birds, mammals and the ...
Most Popular
- The radical conservative case for genetic enhancement
- Is tilapia a human-made freak that we should avoid — or an evolutionary rockstar?
- Viewpoint: Here’s how genetically engineered fruits and vegetables will soon emerge as a grocery store ‘selling point rather than a scare tactic’
- How well does genetic screening for talents and traits work? Beethoven’s DNA suggests he was unlikely to be musical
- Coming era of cattle farming: Genetically engineered dairy cow produces human insulin in milk
- Iowa legislatures join three other states considering ban on pesticide manufacturer lawsuits for alleged health issues if chemical labels are EPA approved
- German professor calls country’s organic lobbyists ‘dishonest’ for hyping potential dangers of gene-edited crops
- How Freddie Mercury got his voice: It wasn’t his teeth
- Viewpoint: Anti-GMO arguments seem silly after 28 years of false narratives about health harms and and genetic contamination
- Vibrant all-natural dyes harvested from microorganisms could bring sustainability to fashion and food industries