To claim someone has ‘Viking ancestors’ is no better than astrology

The following is an edited excerpt.

You may have missed the latest genetic discovery: “One million British men may be directly descended from the Roman legions”.

Such stories are becoming increasingly common. Last week on the BBC miniseries Meet the Izzards we were told that Eddie Izzard is a Viking descendant on his mother’s side and an Anglo-Saxon descendant on his father’s.

Related on the SLP

40th anniversary of NASA’s Project Viking and beginning of search for Martian life Genetic ancestry testing is not ‘astrology’

Viewpoint: Dubious environmental fears: Why the AI buildout is critical to America’s ecological future

Vitamin D, omega-3 fish oil and glucosamine supplements could cause brain damage 

Child-monitoring apps: When the cure is worse than the harm—and how the technology could be tweaked

And for upwards of £150 you too can have your DNA “tested” by any of a number of direct-to-consumer ancestry companies. But how reliable are these claims? The truth is that there is usually little scientific substance to most of them and they are better thought of as genetic astrology.

Read the full article here: To claim someone has ‘Viking ancestors’ is no better than astrology