Alleged danger of GE not looking very real

The following is an edited excerpt.

Once upon a time, a food writer triggered a storm of scientific scorn when he wrote about a study finding plant molecules in the animal bloodstream and linked the results to genetically modified (GM) foods. But these weren’t just any old molecules–they were RNA, strings of genetic information that weren’t supposed to make it past the digestive system into the bloodstream. Yet according to the investigators, Chen-Yu-Zhang and co-authors, not only did these RNAs slip into the blood but they also altered the animal’s physiology in ways that could be harmful.

The food writer who picked up on this research, Ari Levaux, leaped from this initial finding to the conclusion that if regular rice RNA could do this, then so could RNAs from GM foods. That was, Levaux urged in his article, “The Very Real Danger of Genetically Modified Food,” relevant because these RNAs are one tool for developing a GM product. And if everyday RNAs from plants could do something bad to an animal, what sorts of awful, unpredictable things might the GM ones do?

The leap was a pretty big one, and several scientists and science writers, including me, had something to say about it

Read the full story here: Alleged danger of GE not looking very real

Outbreak
Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
ft covidresponseus feature

Video: Viewpoint: The US wrote the global playbook on the coronavirus and then ignored it

A year ago, the United States was regarded as the country best prepared for a pandemic. Our government had spent ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...
gmo corn field x

Do GMO Bt (insect-resistant) crops pose a threat to human health or the environment?

Bt is a bacterium found organically in the soil. It is extremely effective in repelling or killing target insects but ...
favicon

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend