Genetically modified RNA scare seems bogus

| June 28, 2013
ee b e
RNA molecule (CREDIT: Flickr/AJC1).
This article or excerpt is included in the GLP’s daily curated selection of ideologically diverse news, opinion and analysis of biotechnology innovation.

The following is an editorial summary.

The Atlantic’s article, “The Very Real Danger of Genetically Modified Food,” caused a storm by taking a paper suggesting that RNA from plants harm animals and leaping to the conclusion that GM plant RNA could hold untold dangers for humanity.

Skeptical science writer Emily Willingham did some digging in the wake of the article. In her words:

The consensus, both on and off the record, was that these molecules identified in the blood were probably animal RNAs that just looked a lot like the plant versions. Most of the scientists with whom I spoke said that it was highly unlikely that a molecule as touchy and unstable as RNA would make it past the molecular horrors of the digestive system to loiter around threateningly in our bloodstream and organs.

Read the full story here: Alleged Danger of GMOs Not Looking Very Real

Additional Resources:

The GLP featured this article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. The viewpoint is the author’s own. The GLP’s goal is to stimulate constructive discourse on challenging science issues.

Share via
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend