Genetically modified RNA scare seems bogus

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
ee b e
RNA molecule (CREDIT: Flickr/AJC1).

The following is an editorial summary.

The Atlantic’s article, “The Very Real Danger of Genetically Modified Food,” caused a storm by taking a paper suggesting that RNA from plants harm animals and leaping to the conclusion that GM plant RNA could hold untold dangers for humanity.

Skeptical science writer Emily Willingham did some digging in the wake of the article. In her words:

The consensus, both on and off the record, was that these molecules identified in the blood were probably animal RNAs that just looked a lot like the plant versions. Most of the scientists with whom I spoke said that it was highly unlikely that a molecule as touchy and unstable as RNA would make it past the molecular horrors of the digestive system to loiter around threateningly in our bloodstream and organs.

Read the full story here: Alleged Danger of GMOs Not Looking Very Real

Additional Resources:

Outbreak Featured
Infographics: Key charts illustrate split between vaccinated and unvaccinated America

Infographics: Key charts illustrate split between vaccinated and unvaccinated America

Three in 10 American adults remain unvaccinated, according to the latest survey from the KFF. But they’re not a monolith ...
Are GMOs and pesticides threatening bees?

Are GMOs and pesticides threatening bees?

First introduced in 1995, neonicotinoids ...
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.