Different DNA testing companies deliver different results? No surprise (or problem)

The New York Times has published yet another article aiming to prove to readers that genetic testing, especially direct to consumer testing, is useless and perhaps even misleading. In her article, “I Had My DNA Picture Taken, With Varying Results,” by Kira Peikoff, a bioethics graduate student at Columbia University, takes genotype screening tests from three different companies is, shocked, just shocked, to discover that the results do not all agree.

This stunt has been pulled before, most notoriously by the Government Accountability Office (GAO) back in 2010. In my article, “A Genetic Testing Dupe?,” reporting on the GAO’s study, I too noted that I had received differing results from the two testing companies I had used. Was I misled? Not at all.

Read the full, original story:ย From theย New York Times: Another Tiresomely Misleading Bioethical Attack on Personalized Genetic Testing

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-May-26-2026-07_51_21-AM-2
Viewpoint: There are more than 1,000 chemicals in a cup of coffeeโ€”including many substances that can cause cancer. Why isnโ€™t it banned?
Picture1
Sounds we canโ€™t hear โ€” the hidden planetary signals behind science, fear, and misinformation
Screenshot-2026-06-01-at-1.35.32-PM
Viewpoint: Swine farmers are under attack for allegedly mistreating their animals. Here are the facts.
Screenshot-2026-06-02-at-11.59.11-AM
Magnifica Humanitas: Popeโ€™s encyclical broadside against AI naivete and overreach
Screenshot 2025-07-30 at 10.48
Can gene editing eliminate Down syndrome? Scientists have done it in lab-grown cells
Screenshot-2026-05-27-at-10.51.25-AM
Viewpoint: โ€˜Monsantoโ€™ bluesโ€”Planned Netflix movie promises yet another round of anti-glyphosate disinformation
ChatGPT Image Jun 1, 2026, 11_39_17 AM
Viewpoint: When food myths go viral, farmers pay the price
ChatGPT Image May 28, 2026, 08_16_38 PM
Viewpoint: Why the EPA mismeasures cancer risk of chemicals and what should be done to fix it
Screenshot-2026-06-01-at-11.07.22-AM
Viewpoint: Many vaccine-suspicious conservatives and MAHA reject shots for their children by invoking โ€˜patient autonomyโ€™. Thatโ€™s ridiculous.
Screenshot 2025-11-18 at 3.45
Viewpointโ€”GMOs and sustainability: Why buying organic foods is the least environmentally-sensitive food choiceโ€”without offering any health benefits
ChatGPT-Image-May-28-2026-02_12_17-PM
Can โ€˜Social Stress Indicatorsโ€™ help contain social media misfluencers?
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.