We should use genetic engineering to treat disease, not fundamentally alter future children

An advisory committee of the Food and Drug Administration is set to begin two days of meetings tomorrow to consider radical biological procedures that, if successful, would produce genetically modified human beings. This is a dangerous step. These techniques would change every cell in the bodies of children born as a result of their use, and these alterations would be passed down to future generations.

Developers of these modification techniques say they are a way for women with mitochondrial disease to give birth to healthy children to whom they are related genetically. Some are also promoting their use for age-related infertility. These are worthy goals. But these procedures are deeply problematic in terms of their medical risks and societal implications.

Read the full, original story: Genetically Modified Babies

Related on the SLP

Viewpoint: RFK, Jr.’s ‘useful idiots’: His 6-point plan that undermines U.S. health policy rolls along Three parent babies: Parent #3’s impact may go beyond mitochondria

Viewpoint: 7-OH controversy: An opioid is available over-the-counter–even at gas stations. Should we be concerned?

RFK, Jr. likely violated federal ethics guidelines in accepting more than $4,275,000 in gifts and book advances from MAHA allies

No, organic eggs are not more nutritious or necessarily healthier than regular eggs. They are just far more expensive.

Additional Resources:

• Three parent baby debate: FDA ponders mitochondrial manipulation and, perhaps, germline modification too, Genetic Literacy Project
• FDA Considers Trials of ‘Three-Parent Embryos’, Science
• Regulators weigh benefits of ‘three-parent’ fertilization, Nature