GM critic says biotech proponents perpetuate African dependency and poverty

Katine farmer woman

The recent article, GM scaremongering in Africa is disarming the fight against poverty, published in the Guardian’s PovertyMatters Blog on 21 July 2014, is a thinly veiled attack on those of us in Africa and elsewhere who are deeply skeptical of the supposed benefits that genetically modified (GM) crops will bring to the continent. Based on a report by London-based think-tank Chatham House, it represents paternalism of the worst kind, advancing the interests of the biotechnology industry behind a barely constructed façade of philanthropy.

The report itself, compiled from an ‘expert roundtable’ and interviews with donors, policy-makers, scientists, farmers and NGOs (none of whom are identified), makes several erroneous and contradictory arguments concerning the lack of uptake or impact of GM crops in Africa. Firstly, with breathtaking arrogance, it dismisses the massive groundswell of opposition to GM crops emerging across the globe (including here in Africa) as a European-led phenomenon. It further credits lack of uptake to a concerted campaign of ‘misinformation’ by opponents of GM crops and onerous biosafety regulation, resulting in negative political judgments and a ‘treadmill of continuous field trials’.

The bottom line is that this is a fight for food sovereignty – for the rights of people to grow food that suits their environment, protects their biodiversity and serves their ability to eat foods that are wholesome and culturally acceptable. Policies must support systems of agriculture and food production that does not distort or damage local economies.

Read the full, original article: GM promoters promote poverty and dependency in Africa

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-09-17-at-1.07.08-PM
'We are dangerously addicted to antidepressants': Should we heed RFK Jr.’s sobering warning?
Screenshot-2026-09-03-at-10.51.20-AM
Viewpoint: Why do online health lies outlive the evidence that debunks them? Read "Everyone Else Is Lying to You"
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-2-2026-02_03_32-PM
How much of a problem is AI’s water use?
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-23-2026-01_52_03-PM
Viewpoint: 4 very real AI doomsday scenarios
ChatGPT-Image-Aug-26-2026-12_46_16-PM
Viewpoint: The fake controversy over whether combining childhood vaccines is dangerous— a debate science resolved 25 years ago
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-22-2026-10_32_46-AM
There has been a slew of recent reports of food recalls and foodborne outbreaks. Do we face an escalating problem?
Screenshot-2026-09-23-at-11.55.01-AM
How can we know if social media bans actually help teens?
Screenshot-2026-09-23-at-3.15.09-PM
Anti-GMO activists in Pakistan rev up their campaign of dire warnings
Screenshot-2026-09-22-at-11.40.28-AM
After Idaho criminalized abortion providers in 2022, one-third of obstetricians fled. Health care advocates are making rural health the case for repealing the ban
Screenshot-2026-09-17-at-12.00.30-PM
Investigative group ProPublica finds links between ectopic pregnancy deaths and abortion bans
ChatGPT-Image-Sep-17-2026-12_28_43-PM
Vitamin D, omega-3 fish oil and glucosamine supplements could cause brain damage 
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.