New growth standards for infants ignore natural genetic variation

Babies come in all shapes and sizes – or so you might imagine. But according to new international growth charts, a healthy fetus or newborn baby should look broadly the same, regardless of ethnicity or its mother’s size.

The charts have been developed to help identify signs of under-nutrition, stunting, wasting or obesity at the earliest possible stage of development, so that they can be addressed.

Yet the new charts go against recommended practice in many countries – including the UK – where midwives or sonographers assessing fetal growth customise their interpretation to take the parents’ ethnicity or stature into account.

To combat this problem, the INTERGROWTH-21st Project pooled data from thousands of healthy, well-fed mothers from the U.S., UK, India, China, Brazil, Oman, Kenya and Italy, using identical equipment and methods to take regular measurements of their fetuses and newborn babies. These were then used to plot standard growth charts, representing what a fetus’s abdominal circumference, length of thigh bone and head measurements should look like under optimal conditions. For newborns, they plotted a baby’s weight, length and head circumference.

There were some regional differences; for instance, the average birthweight among Indian babies was 2.9 kilograms, versus 3.5 kilograms in the UK. However, Kennedy says the pooling of such data means that the growth curves are representative of healthy babies around the world.

Kennedy acknowledges that there are genetic differences between babies, but says these have a far smaller effect than environmental factors. “Paediatricians have no problem with the idea of international standard for optimal growth from birth until the age of 5,” he says. “All we have done is fill in the gap that exists from pregnancy to birth. Mothers need to ask why their babies are monitored in utero using customised charts and ex utero using international WHO charts that apply to all babies worldwide.”

Read the full, original story: All newborns should be similar size in ideal conditions

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
global warming
‘Implausible’: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenario—soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research shows—but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-01_23_27-PM-2
Viewpoint: Will AI democratize personalized cancer treatment or fuel medical misinformation?

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.