Chimpanzee’s highly heritable intelligence window on human IQ

chimpAP x

A story about chimpanzee intelligence — especially the genetics of chimpanzee intelligence — is really a story about human intelligence. After all, we share some 96 percent of our genetic material, and the similarities between chimps and humans are stunning.

They have language, use tools, even develop distinct cultures. These are all things that, until relatively recently, we thought were uniquely human activities.

So a study in Current Biology from Georgia State University and the Yerkes National Primate Research Center that declares general intelligence in chimpanzees roughly 50 percent heritable (i.e. genetically determined) is a strengthening of the well-established genetic basis for intelligence in humans.

This is the first thorough look at the genetic underpinnings of intelligence in our close kin the primates. The authors of the paper write: “[A]side from early attempts to selectively breed for learning skills in rodents, studies examining the role that genetic factors might play in individual variation in cognitive abilities in nonhuman animals, particularly nonhuman primates, are scare.”

To make up for this scarcity, the authors — led by primatologist William D. Hopkins — put nearly a hundred chimpanzees through a battery of tests. New Scientist’s Andy Coghlan outlines the experimental process:

To assess heritability, Hopkins and his colleagues studied 99 captive chimpanzees – 29 males and 70 females – aged from 9 to 54. The team had the chimps do 13 standard tasks to measure their cognitive abilities.

Hopkins teased out ability in four broad categories: spatial memory and ability; tool use; communication skills; and establishing causality. Tests to remember which of three beakers hid food, for example, helped measure spatial memory, while challenging chimps to obtain visible but otherwise inaccessible food by attracting attention from humans helped measure communication skills.

They also re-tested the same chimps after a year, to see if their data held steady over time. It did. They took all of these tests and combined them to create a “g”-value for each individual, called “g” for general intelligence. This g-value is what they used for broad comparisons, and when they looked for the effects of things like sex (male/female) or rearing history (chimp-reared/human-reared) they found none.

“As is the case in humans,” Hopkins told Science 2.0, “genes matter when it comes to cognitive abilities in chimpanzees. It doesn’t mean that they are the only factor […] but they cannot be ignored.”

Furthermore, the results were “bang on with human results […] showing that results in nearly all of the tests are significantly heritable,” human intelligence genetics researcher Robert Plomin of King’s College London told Coghlan at New Scientist.

This all reinforces the perspective of io9’s Jason G. Goldman, who explains how chimpanzees offer a sort of ‘stripped-down’ version of human intelligence that makes the fundamentals easier to study:

It’s hard to study intelligence in humans — our cultures are incredibly complex, and what counts as “smart” is defined as much by our societies as it is by our genes. So some researchers have turned to chimpanzees to understand what actually gives rise to intelligence in the brain.

Chimpanzee intelligence may be complex, but it’s still not quite the socio-cultural mess that human intelligence often is. So it is their minds and the genes that help build them that may offer the clearest window into our own intelligence yet.

Kenrick Vezina is Gene-ius editor for the Genetic Literacy Project and a freelance science writer, educator, and naturalist based in the Greater Boston area.

Additional Resources:

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Wave Crest Over Red Cross
Viewpoint: Here are the election-inspired Trump administration healthcare policy reversals expected in the coming months
Aerial Sprayer Over Gradient Fields
Farming, food, and chemicals: Post-midterms, the MAHA alliance between Democrats and MAGA Republicans is bruised but not cowed. What comes next?
Supplement Rain Wellness Illustration
Viewpoint: Bedeviled by “toxic inflammation”? How wellness grifters turn this scientific gray zone into a supplement jackpot
Teal Hexagon Technology Icons
4 key ways the Blue Wave will upend science policy
Confident Doctor in Clinical Setting
More than 80% of ‘pro-science’ candidates were swept into office. Will they have a policy impact?
Stacked Protest Signs on Concrete Ledge
Voters hate AI data centers, yet they are crucial to establishing a critical technology. So what’s next?
Microscopic IVF Egg Injection
With technical barriers to human embryo editing falling, ethical concerns escalate
Democratic Donkey Plowing at Sunset
Viewpoint: Democratic tsunami: As the red tide recedes, here are the most likely shifts in food and agricultural policy
Protect-Womens-Sports-at-the-Capitol
Blue, purple and red states passed or reaffirmed bans on trans females competing in women’s sports
Screenshot-2026-11-05-at-1.20.54-PM
$7.35 billion PFAS settlement: 3M to pay people who blame health problems on ‘forever chemicals’ phased out of firefighting foam for more than 20 years
Prescription Capsules Scattered on Twenty-Dollar Bills
Facts & Fallacies podcast: America's health care system is broken. A doctor explains how to fix it, Part 2
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.