Can color-changing flowers quell fears about GMOs?

In a couple years, if you’re at the florist and are trying to decide between red roses or yellow roses, you might have the choice to, well, not choose: Synthetic biologists are working on making flowers that change colors throughout the day, coordinated with the plant’s internal circadian rhythm.

It’s a project that’s reminiscent of the glow-in-the-dark plants that biohackers have created in the lab, except the scientists working on it say that they hope to create a product that the layperson can inherently understand and will want to buy at their local flower shop. It’s synthetic bio for your mom—or for people who might be a bit freaked out by synthetic bio in general.

So, in that spirit, Havens and her colleague, Nikolai Braun, have chosen to create petunias that change color every 12 hours. Rather than plucking a gene from a glow-in-the-dark bacteria or some other creature with a desirable trait, the team simply has to use a gene from another species of petunia.

If you didn’t realize that the flowers are genetically engineered, you probably wouldn’t see them and immediately think of them as “mutants.” Which is the point.

In that sense, it might be a little less scary to the anti-GMO crowd: Botanists have been crossbreeding and hybridizing plants for centuries—Havens and Braun are doing it in a laboratory, with a bit of circadian trickery, of course.

Read the full, original story: Will people actually buy color changing, biohacked flowers?

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot 2025-09-17 at 12.41
Misinformation alert: No, glyphosate use in Canadian forests is not spurring more wildfires
Screenshot 2026-07-11 094410
Growing animal muscle and fat cells inside rice grains and calling it beef: One of numerous genetically engineered products shaking up our ecosystem
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
Screenshot-2026-07-16-at-11.32.12-AM
Viewpoint: Trump appoints climate change hoax promoter to head influential government policy project
Screenshot 2026-07-16 at 8.49
Pete Hegseth’s bizarre Viagra commercial as Trump administration endorses ‘hormone replacement therapy’
file-f-d-d-
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Europe's AC debacle underscores fatal flaw in green activism

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.