Can GMOs save the fragile coral reef ecosystem?

tauchen am gbr

The controversial practice of “environmental engineering” should be adopted in the battle to save the world’s coral reefs from the devastating effects of climate change, scientists have argued.

In a paper published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences on Tuesday, researchers from Australia and the U.S. said drastic measures including genetic modification should not be ruled out as biologists work to preserve vulnerable coral reefs.

The researchers have called for all options to be considered, including the controversial practice of genetic manipulation, selective breeding and accelerating the rate of evolutionary change of some key reef-building coral species.

Coral geneticist Madeleine van Oppen from Townsville’s Australian Institute of Marine Science said while the techniques were commonly adopted in industries such as livestock and forestry, it was rare in the wild.

“I think it is a last resort,” she said. “But you have to develop the biological tool kit now because it will take some time, so we have to test the various options before it is too late.”

Corals are particularly sensitive to global warming, as cyclone activity increases in frequency and intensity, ocean surface temperatures warm and water becomes more acidic.

The boom in crown-of-thorn starfish numbers, destructive fishing and terrestrial run-off are also affecting coral reef health.

Half the Great Barrier Reef’s coral cover disappeared in the 27 years to 2012, previous research has shown, and less than a quarter could be left within a decade unless action is taken.

Van Oppen, a lead author on the paper, said “environmental engineering” techniques for building coral reef resilience also included breeding a new generation of corals to be more tolerant of certain conditions and selective breeding.

Read full, original article: Genetically modified coral could help save reefs, report argues

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
Screenshot-2026-05-08-at-11.55.47-AM
Anti-vax activists falsely blame COVID vaccines for the rising U.S. cancer rate among younger people.
Screenshot-2026-05-19-at-11.23.34-AM
West-originated vaccine disinformation sparks murders of health care workers across Africa
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-12_32_36-PM
Viewpoint: The state of U.S. vaccine policy? Dismal nationally, but some states are stepping up.
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research shows—but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
modi visit sikkim
Viewpoint: Indian PM wants farmers to switch to 50% organic. It would take at least 10 years, likely won’t work, and isn’t more sustainable
Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-1.39.26-PM
Viewpoint: ‘Safer for children?’ Stonyfield yogurt under fire for deceptive organic marketing
placebo
Viewpoint — Alternative medicine and the placebo effect: Selling a reassuring illusion of health
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.