Should women with high risk BRCA mutation follow Angelina Jolie’s path?

Angelina Jolie has done wonders for raising awareness about the so-called โ€œbreast cancer geneโ€โ€”the infamous BRCA1 mutation that can greatly boost a womanโ€™s risk of breast, ovarian, and other cancers.

But with that awareness can come increased anxiety. I am one of the many women in this country who fear they could be a carrier. I recently had my DNA tested through the biotech company 23andMe, and a third-party analysis revealed that I might have harmful mutations on my BRCA1 gene, which might raise my cancer risk. My mother was adopted, so I lack a complete picture of my familyโ€™s medical history. What do I do with this information?

Of course, not every woman who tests positive for harmful mutations will get cancerโ€”but oneโ€™s odds are significantly increased. Fifty-five to 65 percent of women who have the BRCA1 mutation and about 45 percent who have the BRCA2 mutation will develop breast cancer by the time theyโ€™re 70. About 39 percent of women with the BRCA1 mutation and 11 to 17 percent with the BRCA2 mutation will get ovarian cancer by 70.

By comparison, in the general population, only about 12 percent of women will develop breast cancer and 1.4 percent of women will develop ovarian cancer. So testing for these genes can be a life saving precaution.

Read full, original article: High anxiety: What if you think you might have the ‘cancer gene’?

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosateโ€”the world's most heavily-used herbicideโ€”pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-1.29.41-PM
Viewpoint: What happens when whole grains meet modern food manufacturing? Labels donโ€™t tell the whole story.
S
As vaccine rejectionism spreads, measles may be taking a more dangerous turn
Screenshot 2026-05-06 at 2.56
Singularity crisis ahead? Can super babies save us from rogue AI geniuses?
Screenshot-2026-05-06-at-2.07.43-PM
Manufacturing a conspiracy: The timeline of howย  the White House embraced the fringe claim that scientists are being mysteriously murdered
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-27-2026-11_47_30-AM-2
FDAโ€™s expedited drug reviews are hailed in some quarters but other approval practices are problematic
Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-2.26.27-PM
Viewpoint โ€” Food-fear world: The latest activist scientists campaign: Cancer-causing additives
Screenshot-2026-04-30-at-2.19.37-PM
5 myths about summer dehydration that could damage your health โ€” or even kill you
Farmers can talk to plants
Farmers are a major source of misinformationโ€”about farming
Screenshot-2026-03-13-at-12.14.04-PM
The FDA wants to make many popular prescription drugs OTCโ€”a great idea. Hereโ€™s why itโ€™s unlikely to happen
Screenshot 2026-05-06 at 2.19
Vaccine shootout at the CDCย 
Screenshot-2026-04-12-135256
Bixonimania: The fake disease scam that AI swallowed whole
Screenshot-2026-04-03-at-11.15.51-AM
Paraben panic: How a flawed study, media hype, and chemophobia convinced the public of the danger of one of the safest classes of preservatives
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.