Can you accept science of genetics and still have faith in God?

Dr. Francis Collins, the director of the National Institutes of Health, is known as the geneticist behind the Human Genome Project as well as a man of faith. He is leading a Big Data to Knowledge initiative that proposes to track 1 million volunteers to better understand health and disease. And he is the founder of BioLogos Foundation, a group based in Grand Rapids that promotes discussions about Christianity and science.

Q: As a scientist and a person of faith, how does our growing understanding of human genetics affect your faith?

Collins: I was not a believer when I was a graduate student. I became a believer at age 27 after being challenged actually by a patient to explain my atheism and realizing I couldn’t.

That was point where I was just beginning to get into the field of genetics, and many people predicted my head would explode because it would not be possible to both study genetics and believe in God. I found them to be enormously complementary views

Science – of genetics and other things – teaches us a lot about the how – of exactly what biology is all about and how our bodies are put together and how disease happens and how we are related to other species. But it doesn’t teach us anything at all about why. And to me, the why questions are at least as interesting.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the variety of news, opinion and analysis. Read full, original post: God, genetics and Fitbit: How NIH Director Francis Collins brings them together

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-06-17-at-12.31.01-PM
Viewpoint: The dangerous influence of ‘woke’ post-modernism in science
marijuana-pot-in-hand-nveri-st-xpm-t-abq-fkifeos-s-rws-cmpx-
Facts & Fallacies podcast: Legalized weed drives drug addiction, psychosis?
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-4-2026-09_39_03-AM
Transgender female athletes and Title IX: Separating ‘policy’ from ‘legality’
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Sampling_a_strawberry_32206461974
Viewpoint: Which is worse: Trace PFAS ‘forever chemicals’ on strawberries or the fear that scares people away from eating them?
photodune farming tractor s
Viewpoint: Glyphosate may be hazardous, but it is not dangerous as used by farmers. Critics of the Supreme Court’s Roundup ruling garble hazard with risk
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-01_14_50-PM
Viewpoint: Disinformation grift: The wellness industry is a lucrative and mostly worthless marketplace of ‘balms, brews, and baloney’
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-30-2026-11_55_58-AM
Viewpoint—Junk science: How predatory mass tort lawyers twist facts, scare the public about phantom chemical risks, and cash in on billion-dollar settlements
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-19-2026-04_11_20-PM
Daubert for Dummies—Scientific Reliability in U.S. Courts: Daubert, Rule 702, and Made-for-Litigation Evidence
Trans-flag
Explaining the Supreme Court ruling empowering states to ban transgender female athletes from competing in women’s sports
NYPICHPDPICT000011561063
Viewpoint: From magnetizing your head to taking useless supplements, the wellness craze has morphed into an obsession of the affluent
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.