Not ‘born this way’: Genes suggest sexual orientation fluid, not fixed trait

homosexual gay

Gay rights shouldn’t depend on how a person came to be gay, and we should embrace the fact that sexuality can change, says developmental psychologist Lisa Diamond in an interview with New Scientist reporter Lisa Grossman.

LG: Much of your work explores what you call “sexual fluidity”. What does it mean?

LD: It means that people are born with a sexual orientation and also with a degree of sexual flexibility, and they appear to work together. So there are gay people who are very fixedly gay and there are gay people who are more fluid, meaning they can experience attractions that run outside of their orientation. Likewise for heterosexuals. Fluidity is the capacity to experience attractions that run counter to your overall orientation.

LG: Did that argument feature in the recent Supreme Court case that legalised same-sex marriage throughout the U.S.?

LD: What was interesting was that Justice Anthony Kennedy actually said, almost as an offhand comment, that studies suggest sexual orientation is immutable. It’s kind of hilarious because he doesn’t elaborate: he sort of throws it out there – like “oh, we all know that” – but importantly, that was not the basis on which the ruling was made. That shows conventional wisdom still holds the idea that sexual orientation is immutable, but that’s not the basis for legal reasoning in the US. And it shows that we don’t need to be considered a protected class in order to make strong and successful arguments about civil rights.

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. Read full, original post: Sexuality is fluid – it’s time to get past ‘born this way’

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT Image Jul 31, 2026, 08_05_37 AM
26% and far worse than during COVID: Under RFK Jr., Americans’ opinion of ‘revamped’ CDC hits an all-time low
Screenshot-2026-10-26-at-11.06.10-AM
Viewpoint: The organic, good-food, small-farm movement is seductive but wrongheaded. Here’s the sustainability and environmental case for industrial farming
Picture1
Viewpoint: How badly is the U.S. food-safety net fraying? FDA’s bungled handling of the tainted lettuce crisis deepens concerns over cuts to disease tracking and response
Screenshot-2026-10-24-121036
Many hospitals embrace longevity medicine. Are they separating science from hype?
China Innovation Lightbulb 2
China’s 5-year plan to accelerate science innovation is putting the U.S. and Europe in the rearview mirror
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
Screenshot-2026-10-23-at-10.37.12-AM
Viewpoint: Drones, dollars and baby food: Critical innovations that anti-plastic ideologues willfully ignore
Cancer mRNA Vaccine Concept
'A new frontier': Though scorned by RFK Jr., personalized mRNA vaccine offers hope for many suffering from melanoma skin cancer
Crimson Drips Over the White House
In Trump administration redirect, U.S. steers NIH sharply away from biodefense and pandemic preparedness
Healthy Food Sensitivity Test Collection
Viewpoint: That’ll be $300: The wellness industry’s junk science scam to ‘fix’ your immune system that isn’t broken
West-Virginia-SNAP-Water-Bottle-Sticker
A ‘shining success’ or 'empty promises’: Two years along, West Virginians assess MAHA’s food promises
Screenshot 2026-10-16 at 5.38
PFAS in Agriculture: Science, Uncertainty, and Risk Communication
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.