Activist beekeepers sue EPA for not moving to restrict neonicotinoids

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis.

With their livelihoods in the balance, beekeepers have grown frustrated with the EPA’s lack of action on neonicotinoid insecticides (neonics) which they believe are leading to colony collapse disorder.

Neonics have become the most commonly used insecticides in the world. That neonics can kill honeybees is not up for debate. If a bee flies through neonic dust, she’ll die instantly. What is contested are the effects of sublethal exposures to neonics over the course of a worker bee’s six-week lifespan as she gathers pollen and nectar that is laced with trace amounts — and what happens when she brings it back to the hive. According to a European Academies Science Advisory Council report, the effects are cumulative.

But the world right isn’t a friendly place for bees, even without pesticides. Since the 1980s, honeybees have been preyed on by a disease-spreading mite. Meanwhile, new bee pathogens are emerging at warp speed. All of which is why entomologists like Dennis vanEngelsdorp, who was part of the group that gave colony collapse disorder its name, caution against assigning just one cause to what is no doubt a complex problem.

It’s the EPA’s job to sort out the science, and if not to fully protect the environment, then at least to make sure that one particular industry (agrochemicals) doesn’t ruin nature to such an extent that it too drastically hurts the bottom line of others (commercial beekeepers).

When it comes to the plight of the bees, it’s tempting to have someone or something to blame. In time, neonics could prove to be a limited factor in bee die-offs, a single leak in a sinking ship, as entomologist May Berenbaum has put it.

Still beekeepers are suing the EPA, not for money, but for regulation. The suit not only alleges that the agency has not met its own criteria for granting approval of the neonic clothianidin, but also challenges its approval process overall.

Read full, original post: What Is Killing America’s Bees and What Does It Mean for Us?

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-03-13-at-12.14.04-PM
The FDA wants to make many popular prescription drugs OTC—a great idea. Here’s why it’s unlikely to happen
Screenshot 2026-05-06 at 2.56
Singularity crisis ahead? Can super babies save us from rogue AI geniuses?
Screenshot-2026-04-20-at-2.26.27-PM
Viewpoint — Food-fear world: The latest activist scientists campaign: Cancer-causing additives
Screenshot-PM-24
Viewpoint: The herbicide glyphosate isn’t perfect. Banning it would be far worse.
Screenshot-2026-05-01-at-11.56.24-AM
‘Science moves forward when people are willing to think differently’: Memories of DNA maverick Craig Venter
images
The never-ending GMO debate: Pros and cons
Screenshot-2026-04-03-at-11.15.51-AM
Paraben panic: How a flawed study, media hype, and chemophobia convinced the public of the danger of one of the safest classes of preservatives
Screenshot-2026-04-30-at-2.19.37-PM
5 myths about summer dehydration that could damage your health — or even kill you
79d03212-2508-45d0-b427-8e9743ff6432
Viewpoint: The Casey Means hustle—Wellness woo opportunism dressed up as medical wisdom
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-02_20_13-PM
How RFK, Jr.’s false vaccine claims are holding up $600 million to fight diseases in poor countries
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.