Pesticides and food: It’s not a black and white issue

Special 6-part series starting on

FIRST ARTICLE: Has pesticide use decreased over the last 40 years?

Grocery Manufacturers, biotech giants spend big bucks promoting GM salmon, voluntary GMO labeling laws

| | August 20, 2015

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis.

Americans want a more transparent food system. Recent polling suggests Americans favor labeling that tells them exactly how and where their food is produced. And yet, several bills are currently moving through Congress that could make it much harder to learn about the source of our food.

These bills would prevent state and local governments from requiring labeling of GMOs. Food companies shelled out over $100 millionto promote and lobby for this legislation in the first six months of 2015 alone.

Businesses and trade groups promoting these policies say putting more information on food labels will send the wrong message about food safety, add costs, and pose barriers to trade. But good food advocates disagree. “We’re not saying anything’s unsafe,” says Environmental Working Group (EWG) policy analyst Libby Foley. “We’re saying it’s about consumer choice.”

So far this year, food and beverage companies have spent $51.6 million on a series of lobbying efforts to defeat GMO labeling laws, including the Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act of 2015 (H.R. 1599.) According to a recent analysis by EWG, nearly a quarter of this money—$12.6 million—comes from just six companies: Coca-Cola, General Mills, Kellogg’s, Land O’Lakes, and PepsiCo.

Related article:  Nanoparticles in sunscreen get bad rap, but evidence they cause human harm is slim

Other big spenders in these efforts include the Grocery Manufacturers Association ($5.1 million); American Farm Bureau (nearly $1 million); and the National Restaurant Association ($2 million). Many state farm bureaus have also chipped in.

An additional $4.1 million has been spent so far this year by companies to promote genetically engineered salmon, with most of this coming from the Biotechnology Industry Association.

So where does this leave consumers? Right now, the only way to be sure the food you buy doesn’t contain genetically engineered foods is to seek out the USDA’s certified organic and Non-GMO Project‘s GMO-free label.

Read full, original post: Big Food is Spending Millions to Lobby for Less Transparency

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion, and analysis. Click the link above to read the full, original article.

1 thought on “Grocery Manufacturers, biotech giants spend big bucks promoting GM salmon, voluntary GMO labeling laws”

  1. The fallacy Ms. Grossman makes is the same one anti-GMO activists have said over and over, that ostensibly the American public supports labeling.
    The enormous failure of the last two ballot initiatives in Oregon and Colorado show otherwise, that once voters are educated about how misrepresentative those initiatives have been, and the lack of any credible rationale for labeling from the viewpoint of real or useful consumer information, they reject labeling initiatives.
    Still, that myth that “Americans favor labeling” endures. Weird, eh?

Leave a Comment

News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.

Send this to a friend