Genes may be responsible for your insatiable sweet tooth

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. 

Ever find yourself fantasizing about decadent sweets on the last few miles of your run? Some of us can’t wait to get our hands on a caramel ice cream brownie sundae!

But some of my runner friends find their teeth aching at the mere thought of an indulgence as sweet as that. Countless people also avoid treats believing that eating them causes your body to crave more sugary foods. However, a recent study proposes that your genes might be responsible for your perception of sweet.

The researchers selected a sample of 1,901 adolescents and young adults between the ages of 12 and 26 years. The sample included 243 pairs of identical twins, 452 pairs of fraternal twins, and 511 unpaired individuals. The researchers asked the participants to taste and rate the sweetness intensity of four sweeteners: glucose, fructose, aspartame, and neohesperidine dihydrochalcone (NHDC)

The study found a common genetic factor appeared to be responsible for more than 75 percent of the genetic variance in the four sweeteners. This suggests the differences in perceived sweet intensity are due to a single set of genes. The variation in sweet perception may lead those born with a weak sweet perception to sprinkle more sugar on their strawberries to achieve the same level of sweetness as others.

Read full, original post: Have a Sweet Tooth? Maybe Blame Your Genes

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-22-2026-09_13_07-AM
Viewpoint—The Strategic Litigation boom: Understanding the tightening coalition among NGOs, foundations, journalists, and tort lawyers
How to Include More Strawberries in Your Diet
Strawberries are berries—and 35 other surprising food and drink myths
ChatGPT-Image-May-22-2026-10_26_09-AM
Trump-RFK, Jr. National Science Board firings: Accountability vs. partisan meddling
Screenshot 2026-07-11 094410
Growing animal muscle and fat cells inside rice grains and calling it beef: One of numerous genetically engineered products shaking up our ecosystem

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.