Academic scientists’ participation in GMO debate neither new nor ‘inappropriate’

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

Academic scientists have played key roles in the history of “GMO crops,” including an important role in communicating with the public in the face of significant disinformation.

On September 5th, the New York Times published an article by Eric Lipton titled “Food Industry Enlisted Academics in G.M.O. Lobbying War, Emails Show.” Lipton misleadingly implies that there is some sort of recent and inappropriate industry influence on science communication.

Academic scientists were deeply involved in the dialog about how to regulate GMOs so that their benefits could be achieved without environmental or health issues.  This was a public conversation, but since most of this occurred prior to the internet age it tends to go unrecognized.

Before and soon after the technology was commercialized, academic scientists became involved in voluntary efforts to explain the new crops.  They gave talks, they wrote books, they set up lecture series and they started blogs and discussion forums.  These were not efforts solicited or funded by biotech companies. They were motivated by a sincere desire to counteract rampant disinformation that has severely limited the application of this technology.

In 2013, a biotech industry association decided to launch a website called “GMO Answers” to allow consumers to get answers to their questions. Logically, those running the website went to the  already-active biotech science communicators to see if they would be willing to field some of the questions as unpaid participants.

With some of the latest breakthroughs and reductions in research costs, now even small entities could bring new things to market or those in need via a non-market avenue.  What stands in the way is the very well funded anti-GMO machine. The current pro-biotech academic scientists participating in this debate aren’t doing anything inappropriate or new.

Read full, original post:  Why Do Some Academic Scientists Stand Up For GMO Crops?

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
Talking Biotech
Genetics Unzipped
Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

Video: Test everyone – Slovakia goes its own way to control COVID

As Europe sees record coronavirus cases and deaths, Slovakia is testing its entire adult population. WSJ's Drew Hinshaw explains how ...
mag insects image superjumbo v

Disaster interrupted: Which farming system better preserves insect populations: Organic or conventional?

A three-year run of fragmentary Armageddon-like studies had primed the journalism pumps and settled the media framing about the future ...
dead bee desolate city

Are we facing an ‘Insect Apocalypse’ caused by ‘intensive, industrial’ farming and agricultural chemicals? The media say yes; Science says ‘no’

The media call it the “Insect Apocalypse”. In the past three years, the phrase has become an accepted truth of ...
globalmethanebudget globalcarbonproject cropped x

Infographic: Cows cause climate change? Agriculture scientist says ‘belching bovines’ get too much blame

A recent interview by Caroline Stocks, a UK journalist who writes about food, agriculture and the environment, of air quality ...
organic hillside sweet corn x

Organic v conventional using GMOs: Which is the more sustainable farming?

Many consumers spend more for organic food to avoid genetically modified products in part because they believe that “industrial agriculture” ...
benjamin franklin x

Are most GMO safety studies funded by industry?

The assertion that biotech companies do the research and the government just signs off on it is false ...

Environmental Working Group: EWG challenges safety of GMOs, food pesticide residues

Known by some as the "Environmental Worrying Group," EWG lobbies for tighter GMO legislation and famously puts out annual "dirty dozen" list of fruits and ...
m hansen

Michael Hansen: Architect of Consumers Union ongoing anti-GMO campaign

Michael K. Hansen (born 1956) is thought by critics to be the prime mover behind the ongoing campaign against agricultural biotechnology at Consumer Reports. He is an ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
Optional. Mail on special occasions.
Send this to a friend