23andMe works with FDA, bets on science

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis. 

Last week, privately held 23andMe launched an approved Personal Genome Service (PGS). The company, which said it had worked closely with the FDA to validate its DNA analysis offerings, had received a stern warning letter from the agency in 2013 about its direct-to-consumer (DTC) spit kits for DNA collection and reports generated from gene analysis data.

“I am hopeful for 2015, it has been quite a transformation for the company, to really change and go through this entire process,” noted CEO Anne Wojcicki, who added that 23andMe revamped its approach to communicating and dealing with the FDA. The result: in February it won its first approval for a test for Bloom syndrome. Along with this authorization, the FDA also classified carrier screening tests as class II devices, which the agency intends to exempt from premarket review.

“We had to make a decision as a company whether we were going to stay in the business of personal genomic analysis,” said Angela Calman-Wonson, 23andMe’s vp of communications. “The classification gave us a road map for what we still had to go through for the validation process. The company went with genomic detection of autosomal recessive carrier status because it was the best understood area of genetics and emphasized that it was not testing for the diseases [themselves].”

Read full, original post: 23andMe Goes All In For Science

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.noReviewsLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

ChatGPT-Image-Jul-17-2026-12_42_10-PM
Viewpoint: RFK, Jr. is setting up a panel to compensate people who claim they were injured by a COVID vaccine–no proof needed 
Screenshot-2026-07-01-at-2.49.48-PM
Dr. TikTok and male fertility: Viral claims tout GLP-1 drugs as fertility boosters. What does the science say?
reverse-aging
Rapamycin: Here’s the skinny on the anti-aging pill that increases the lifespan—of mice by 10%
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
vitamin k refuse genai
More and more babies are developing uncontrollable bleeding—linked directly to vaccine deniers' rejection of vitamin K shots
UK scientists support loosening restrictions limiting embryo research
Are we edging closer to precisely, and safely, editing human embryos?
Screenshot-2026-07-17-at-12.55.22-PM
Viewpoint: Is bagged salad a dangerous science experiment? Challenging an online misinformation campaign
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-25-2026-12_23_17-PM
No, Bill Gates did not secretly engineer ticks to promote veganism
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-6-2026-02_25_26-PM
40 million Americans take glucosamine. If you have memory loss, it could accelerate cognitive decline.
Screenshot 2026-07-11 094410
Growing animal muscle and fat cells inside rice grains and calling it beef: One of numerous genetically engineered products shaking up our ecosystem
ma art page image
‘It’s time to have a conversation’: Once adamantly opposed to human gene editing, UK’s The Guardian acknowledges likely benefits
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-17-2026-03_29_08-PM
Viewpoint: What’s the impact of the U.S. abandoning support for global health?
ChatGPT-Image-Jul-9-2026-02_39_22-PM
Viewpoint: Polyphenols or NAD+ supplements to combat aging: No, Gwenyth Paltrow and followers, don’t waste your money.
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.