‘FDA approval of genetically engineered salmon is win for environment’

Screen Shot at AM

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

After 20 years of regulatory scrutiny and political wrangling, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration(FDA) finally approved a genetically modified salmon, one scientists say delivers large environmental benefits over existing farmed salmon.

Ironically, the salmon, known as AquAdvantage, was hotly opposed by environmental groups.

. . . .

The AquAdvantage salmon grows to adult size twice as fast — in two rather than four years — and requires 20 percent less feed than today’s Atlantic salmon, 100 percent of which are already farmed.

It also requires no antibiotics, unlike conventionally farmed Atlantic salmon, which public health officials warn can contribute to antibiotic resistance.

“AquAdvantage salmon is as safe to eat as any non-genetically engineered (GE) Atlantic salmon, and also as nutritious,” said the FDA.

. . . .

Ninety percent of the world’s fish stocks are either over-fished or at capacity, but global demand for fish is expected to double by 2050 as the human population grows and poor nations become richer.

AquaAdvantage will be the first Atlantic salmon produced on land in warehouses, the method favored by environmental groups. Being produced on land spares natural ocean environments the disruption of large farms complete with pens and motorboats.

Where 8 pounds of feed is required to create one pound of beef, just one pound of feed is required to create one pound of AquaAdvantage salmon, the company says

Local production reduces the pollution from flying salmon in by jet plane. AquaBounty says it will produce 90 percent fewer climate-changing carbon emissions.

Read full, original post: Victory for frankenfish and for Mother Earth: Column

 

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
global warming
‘Implausible’: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenario—soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research shows—but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-01_23_27-PM-2
Viewpoint: Will AI democratize personalized cancer treatment or fuel medical misinformation?

Sorry. No data so far.

glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.