Do patients who donate genetic information to research deserve financial compensation?

DIY BIO SOSA pg web

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

Scientists today rely on thousands of donors to share their health information. This data is often stored in giant databases called biobanks, and combined with the medical record. President Obama is hoping to collect about 1 million people’s DNA for a huge new biobank, which would spur important medical research.

But new business models are emerging in the private sector that demonstrate the monetary value of our DNA. It’s a little known fact that 23andMe, the direct-to-consumer genetics company, makes its money by selling people’s health data to pharmaceutical companies in bulk for thousands of dollars. (23andMe’s business model involves analyzing its customers’ DNA on behalf of pharma companies, including Pfizer and Genentech.)

For this, and other reasons, some patient advocates are calling for patients to get a slice of the revenues. “I think there may be an economy emerging, in which we might want to figure out how to include them (donors) in the commerce that is taking place around clinical recruitment,” says Sharon Terry, founder and CEO of the nonprofit group Genetic Alliance, which advocates on behalf of people with genetic diseases.

According to Terry, doctors are also being paid to recruit patients in clinical trials; so why not the patient themselves? “We are actually considering a credit system whereby individuals, their communities and our platform could all have a ‘credit’ in a system of commerce,” she explains.

Read full, original post: Should You Get Paid For Your DNA?

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot 2026-10-16 at 5.38
PFAS in Agriculture: Science, Uncertainty, and Risk Communication
Discarded Green Cap on Public Trash Can
'Blatant slap in the face': MAHA activists turn on RFK Jr. and Trump administration
newborn baby spit up gerd
Vaccine-preventable congenital infections are a leading driver of autism
Screenshot 2026-10-16 at 11.17
Viewpoint: Latest attack on renewable energy and farmers, new USDA rules could put solar grants out of reach for small producers
Government Briefing on Autism Trends
Viewpoint: ‘Statistical murder’: Kennedy’s expanding record of “duplicity and mendacity”
ChatGPT-Image-Mar-10-2026-01_39_01-PM
Viewpoint—“Miracle molecule” debunked: Why acemannan supplements don’t work
FDA Vials and Syringes Flat Lay
Online gold rush of unapproved peptides is outrunning federal regulators
Screenshot-2026-10-12-at-10.44.38-AM
Widely condemned as unethical, hepatitis B vaccine study funded by RFK Jr’s CDC gets a final greenlight
Screenshot-2026-10-15-at-9.51.15-AM
 Viewpoint: Selective pronatalism: The radical “ethical” case challenging parents’ right to end a pregnancy when a fetus has a severe genetic disorder
Prescription Capsules Scattered on Twenty-Dollar Bills
Facts & Fallacies podcast: America's health care system is broken. A doctor explains how to fix it, Part 2
Screenshot-2026-10-15-at-12.13.33-PM
Ahead of the midterms, Meta has paid at least 29 anti-LGBTQ accounts for their posts
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.