Hate scratchy wool? Scientists have identified sheep gene responsible

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

Bridget Ramage is a keen knitter, and she knows there’s nothing worse than a prickly yarn.

“I can’t wear it around my neck it and it irritates the heebie-jeebies out of me,” Ms Ramage said.

And it’s that irritable feeling that scientists at Lincoln University have been trying to get to the bottom of.

“It’s really coarse — it’s like sand paper. You wear that against your skin [and] in seconds, you [will] sand paper things off your skin,” Lincoln University’s Jon Hickford said.

Jon Hickford and his team have been looking at the DNA of sheep and found genetics makes some pricklier than others.

“Wool fibre is a whole collection of proteins — it’s one of the key genes, and it’s a variation in that gene.”

Prof Hickford says about 10 percent of sheep appear to carry the gene, and a simple DNA test will identify and potentially breed out of the flock.

“It’s a form of a gene we can breed. That form of a gene — some people call it a mutant gene, I just say it’s a bad form — we can breed that out of the sheep, get rid of it and have better sheep,” he said.

Read full, original post: Prickly wool may become thing of the past

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Screenshot 2026-05-26 at 10.15
Viewpoint: Double standard—Why does the wellness industry get a free pass while Big Healthcare is treated as morally suspect?
Screenshot-2026-06-03-at-3.33.44-PM
Viewpoint: Vaccine deniers are attacking a life-saving Vitamin K shot for newborns that isn’t even a vaccine
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-1.44.09-PM
Viewpoint: Scientists have scrapped the worst-case climate scenario. Is that proof that climate change is a hoax, as Trump claims?
px extra strength tylenol and tylenol pm
Why ‘null-findings’ on Tylenol’s safety for pregnant women barely move the needle on countering misinformation
Screenshot-2026-06-08-at-10.19.30-AM
‘Natural’ wellness supplements linked to liver injury
Screenshot-2026-06-08-at-1.35.30-PM
Viewpoint: Social media and fake natural health propaganda fuel surge in use of mostly useless supplements
ChatGPT-Image-Jun-10-2026-12_57_24-PM
Viewpoint: Why gene-editing babies is moral and certain to happen
ChatGPT-Image-May-28-2026-12_56_54-PM
Viewpoint: Vaccines' non-specific effects? The ‘shoddy’ Danish couple whose 'research’ inspires RFK, Jr.’s health delusion
Credit: ACSH
Viewpoint: Who and what’s to blame for the surge in vaccine-preventable diseases?
Screenshot 2025-08-25 203032
Mazzenga’s 20-year old muscles: How a still-going-strong 92-year old sprinter wins every race she enters
Screenshot-2026-06-05-at-2.12.30-PM
Some plants can poison you. So how did humans figure out what is safe to eat?
ChatGPT Image May 26, 2026, 08_42_17 AM (1)
Viewpoint: Greenpeace and poison: How environmental advocacy groups rely on compliant (and often ignorant) journalists to spread disinformation and spark litigation
Screen Shot at AM
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Right-wing politics bad for your health? Separating speculation from science
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.