EPA posts, takes offline ‘final’ report concluding glyphosate ‘not likely carcinogenic’

monsanto roundup

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

Glyphosate does not cause cancer … if you read about it over the weekend.

That was the conclusion of a report published online by the Environmental Protection Agency on Friday, April 30, 2016, finally shutting down a 30-year debate by giving a definitive answer to a hotly contested topic. But, by Monday, May 2, it was gone.

The report, “Evaluation of the Carcinogenic Potential of Glyphosate,” was published by the Cancer Assessment Review Committee (CARC), the branch of the EPA that determines if a chemical causes cancer in humans.

[The 87-page report was preserved online before the EPA took it down and is available here]

[Read the GLP’s GMO FAQ report “Is Glyphosate Dangerous? here]

. . . .

This comprehensive report analyzed multiple different studies, with the conclusion on page 77 entitled “CLASSIFICATION OF CARCINOGENIC POTENTIAL.”

Here it states:

  • Glyphosate is classified as “Not Likely to be Carcinogenic to Humans.”
  • The epidemiological evidence at this time does not support a causal relationship between glyphosate exposure and solid tumors.
  • There is also no evidence to support a causal relationship between glyphosate exposure and the following non-solid tumors: leukemia, multiple myeloma, or Hodgkin’s disease.

. . . .

Why would such a comprehensive report with a clear conclusion be removed from the website? The EPA told Reuters, in an email, that its assessment was not final (a particularly odd word choice for a report presenting their “final” guidelines) and that the documents were “preliminary.” The agency also stated that the “final” (final) report will be published later this year.

Read full, original post: EPA Magically Makes Glyphosate Safety Report Disappear

 

{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.singularReviewCountLabel }}
{{ reviewsTotal }}{{ options.labels.pluralReviewCountLabel }}
{{ options.labels.newReviewButton }}
{{ userData.canReview.message }}

Related Articles

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Infographic: Global regulatory and health research agencies on whether glyphosate causes cancer

Does glyphosate—the world's most heavily-used herbicide—pose serious harm to humans? Is it carcinogenic? Those issues are of both legal and ...

Most Popular

Picture1
The FDA couldn’t find a vaccine safety crisis, so it buried its own research
ChatGPT-Image-May-7-2026-01_23_27-PM-2
Viewpoint: Will AI democratize personalized cancer treatment or fuel medical misinformation?
Screenshot-2026-04-22-at-12.21.32-PM
Viewpoint: Why the retracted Monsanto glyphosate study doesn’t change the science—the world’s most popular herbicide is safe 
vax-misinformation-main
Facts & Fallacies Podcast: Limit free speech to blunt social media misinfo?
ChatGPT-Image-Apr-16-2026-02_56_53-PM
Financial incentives, over diagnosis, and weak oversight: Autism claims are driving up Medicare costs
ChatGPT-Image-May-12-2026-11_27_01-AM-2
AI likely to improve health care, research shows—but not for blacks and ethnic minorities
ChatGPT-Image-May-1-2026-11_42_59-AM-2
Viewpoint: NAD is the wellness grifters latest evidence-lite longevity fad. At least the mice are impressed.
global warming
‘Implausible’: Top climate scientists reject worst-case scenario—soaring temperatures and fast-rising sea levels
Screenshot-2026-04-13-at-1.39.26-PM
Viewpoint: ‘Safer for children?’ Stonyfield yogurt under fire for deceptive organic marketing
modi visit sikkim
Viewpoint: Indian PM wants farmers to switch to 50% organic. It would take at least 10 years, likely won’t work, and isn’t more sustainable
ChatGPT-Image-May-20-2026-04_53_21-PM-2
Viewpoint: Doctors can fight health misinformation — if hospitals let them
glp menu logo outlined

Get news on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.