National Academies report draws criticism from anti-GMO groups

Screen Shot at AM

The GLP aggregated and excerpted this blog/article to reflect the diversity of news, opinion and analysis.

The panel . . . convened by the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering and Medicine and asked to review . . . the benefits and hazards of GE crops. The 388-page report is nuanced and, on some issues, equivocal, with comments from all sides of the issue.

. . . .

But the recommendation of a process-agnostic approach to new crops. . . drew immediate criticism from the technology watchdog organization ETC Group.


“In our view the report is inconsistent on the . . . question of whether or not to regulate the new techniques such as genome editing and synthetic biology. . . .” ETC spokesman Jim Thomas said by email. . . .

Related article:  Activists sue FDA, claim agency has no authority to approve genetically modified animals

. . . .

Dana Perls, senior campaigner . . . with Friends of the Earth, said the biotech industry has long supported the National Academies.

“I’m concerned that their findings and recommendations are deceptive and even biased toward industry interests,” she said in advance of reading the report.


The National Academies did not appoint anyone from the biotech industry. . . nor use any money from the industry. .  . all committee members were required to disclose any potential conflicts of interest.

Read full, original post: Are GMO crops safe? Focus on the plant, not the process, scientists say.

Outbreak Daily Digest
Biotech Facts & Fallacies
GLP Podcasts
Infographic: Here’s where GM crops are grown around the world today

Infographic: Here’s where GM crops are grown around the world today

Do you know where biotech crops are grown in the world? This updated ISAAA infographics show where biotech crops were ...
News on human & agricultural genetics and biotechnology delivered to your inbox.
glp menu logo outlined

Newsletter Subscription

* indicates required
Email Lists
Send this to a friend